Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sans, N.
Right arrow Articles by Railhac, J.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sans, N.
Right arrow Articles by Railhac, J.-J.
(Radiology. 1999;212:687-692.)
© RSNA, 1999


Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Osteoid Osteoma: CT-guided Percutaneous Resection and Follow-up in 38 Patients1

Nicolas Sans, MD, Denise Galy-Fourcade, MD, Jacques Assoun, MD, Thierry Jarlaud, MD, Hélène Chiavassa, MD, Paul Bonnevialle, MD, Nadine Railhac, MD, Jacques Giron, MD, Hélène Morera-Maupomé, MD and Jean-Jacques Railhac, MD

1 From the Central Medical Imaging Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan, Place du Docteur Baylac, F-31059 Toulouse, France. Received July 21, 1998; revision requested August 13; final revision received December 3; accepted March 16, 1999. Address reprint requests to N.S. (e-mail: sans.n@chu-toulouse.fr).


    Abstract
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
PURPOSE: To reevaluate at medium term the results of computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous resection of osteoid osteomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients who had undergone treatment by means of this technique were reexamined with a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. The short- and medium-term clinical course and histologic features of the resection specimens were analyzed.

RESULTS: The bone fragment could be analyzed in all cases, and the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was confirmed in 28 patients (74%). A different diagnosis was made in six patients: mucoid cyst, subchondral arthritic geode, fibrous dysplastic lesion, focal osteochondritis, or focal chronic osteomyelitis. Cure was obtained in 32 patients (84%), whatever the cause. Complications, generally minor and transient, were observed in nine patients (24%). The most severe complications were two femoral fractures and one focal chronic osteomyelitis due to Staphylococcus aureus infection.

CONCLUSION: The results of this study confirm the efficacy of percutaneous resection of osteoid osteomas and the possibility of using this method for successful treatment of other small bone lesions.

Index terms: Computed tomography (CT), guidance, 40.12119 • Interventional procedures, 40.12119, 40.1267 • Osteoma, 40.3122


    Introduction
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
The treatment of osteoid osteomas long consisted of en bloc excision, which is damaging and disproportionate to the size of the lesion. Alternatives recently have been proposed that use computed tomographic (CT) guidance, in particular percutaneous excision, described by Voto et al (1) and Kohler et al (2) and developed since 1989 at our institution. Percutaneous resection of osteoid osteomas is a technique of interventional radiology that is becoming more commonly used. We report our experience with this technique in 38 patients to evaluate the medium-term outcome of this technique of percutaneous resection.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Population
From March 1989 to December 1995, lesions suggestive of osteoid osteoma were resected percutaneously in 41 patients. The diagnosis was oriented by a range of clinical and radiologic features. The treatment option and decision were proposed to the patient after multidisciplinary discussions between surgeons and radiologists. The course was thus followed in 38 patients, three being lost to follow-up in the intervening period. The population in our study comprised nine women and 29 men (sex ratio, 3:2; mean age, 23.4 years; age range, 5–64 years). The lesions were located in the leg (n = 32), the arm (n = 2), the spine (n = 2), and the pelvic girdle (n = 2).

Methods
Resection technique.—Percutaneous resection (16) required coaxial instruments (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) comprising a guide wire, a trocar, an 11-mm-diameter external sheath, a toothed drill (7- or 10-mm diameter), and a 9-mm diameter drill (Figs 1, 2). Resection was performed in the CT room with sterile surgical conditions. The procedure was performed with local-regional (four cases) or general (34 cases) anesthesia. The latter made the procedure easier by lessening patient discomfort due to a prolonged period on the table and also ensured perfect immobility.



View larger version (231K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Photograph of the drill resection system shows (left to right) guide wire, trocar, 11-mm-diameter external sheath, 9-mm-diameter toothed drill, and 9-mm-diameter drill.

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Photograph of the coaxial system assembled for resection.

 
The lesion was localized by using 2-mm-thick contiguous sections (Fig 3a3c) to plan the ballistic course. The lesion was then extracted by using the toothed drill or a Laredo trocar, a small trocar 3 mm in diameter, for smaller lesions. At the end of the procedure, additional scans were obtained to confirm complete or partial excision of the lesion. If excision was partial, a second drilling procedure could be attempted. In certain cases, curettage was performed to remove any residual nidus fragments.



View larger version (161K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a. Images obtained in a 21-year-old woman. (a) Axial CT scan obtained with contiguous 2-mm sections demonstrates a typical 5-mm-diameter calcified nidus (arrow) of osteoid osteoma of the distal femur. (b) Sagittal T1-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance image (repetition time, 642 msec; echo time, 12 msec) with contrast enhancement shows localized enhancement and demonstrates the inflammatory reaction (arrow) near the osteoid osteoma (arrowhead). (c) Axial CT scan obtained with the patient in the prone position shows the guide wire being inserted into the nidus (arrow). (d) Postprocedural reformatted two-dimensional sagittal CT image shows complete excision (arrow) of the nidus.

 


View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b. Images obtained in a 21-year-old woman. (a) Axial CT scan obtained with contiguous 2-mm sections demonstrates a typical 5-mm-diameter calcified nidus (arrow) of osteoid osteoma of the distal femur. (b) Sagittal T1-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance image (repetition time, 642 msec; echo time, 12 msec) with contrast enhancement shows localized enhancement and demonstrates the inflammatory reaction (arrow) near the osteoid osteoma (arrowhead). (c) Axial CT scan obtained with the patient in the prone position shows the guide wire being inserted into the nidus (arrow). (d) Postprocedural reformatted two-dimensional sagittal CT image shows complete excision (arrow) of the nidus.

 


View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3c. Images obtained in a 21-year-old woman. (a) Axial CT scan obtained with contiguous 2-mm sections demonstrates a typical 5-mm-diameter calcified nidus (arrow) of osteoid osteoma of the distal femur. (b) Sagittal T1-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance image (repetition time, 642 msec; echo time, 12 msec) with contrast enhancement shows localized enhancement and demonstrates the inflammatory reaction (arrow) near the osteoid osteoma (arrowhead). (c) Axial CT scan obtained with the patient in the prone position shows the guide wire being inserted into the nidus (arrow). (d) Postprocedural reformatted two-dimensional sagittal CT image shows complete excision (arrow) of the nidus.

 


View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3d. Images obtained in a 21-year-old woman. (a) Axial CT scan obtained with contiguous 2-mm sections demonstrates a typical 5-mm-diameter calcified nidus (arrow) of osteoid osteoma of the distal femur. (b) Sagittal T1-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance image (repetition time, 642 msec; echo time, 12 msec) with contrast enhancement shows localized enhancement and demonstrates the inflammatory reaction (arrow) near the osteoid osteoma (arrowhead). (c) Axial CT scan obtained with the patient in the prone position shows the guide wire being inserted into the nidus (arrow). (d) Postprocedural reformatted two-dimensional sagittal CT image shows complete excision (arrow) of the nidus.

 
Follow-up of the course.—Thirty-eight patients were examined by the radiologic and surgical teams during the first 6 months of 1997. All patients were examined after a minimal postoperative period of 1 year (mean follow-up, 3.7 years; range, 1.0–6.6 years). For each patient, retrospective and prospective data were collected, including the result of histologic examination of the resected specimen, the immediate postoperative and longer term clinical course, and any complications. Cure was evidenced by rapid and definitive disappearance of pain and in certain cases by means of follow-up radiographs or CT scans (Somatom Plus 4; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) obtained with a delay of at least 1 year after the procedure. Informed consent was always obtained from the patients. No invasive procedure was performed subsequently.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Clinical Data
Clinical data for all the patients are provided in Table 1. In agreement with the data in the literature (13), the prevalence of osteoid osteoma was higher in the second and third decades of life. The initial presentation of the lesion generally was classic. Pain, greater at night, was present in 30 of 38 patients (79%) and responded well to acetylsalicylic acid in 25 patients (66%). The mean interval before diagnosis was about 1.6 years, with a minimum of 46 days and a maximum of 9 years.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Symptoms, Localization, and Clinical Course
 
Technique
Resection was performed with a toothed drill in 33 cases and with a Laredo trocar in three cases. In two cases, excision with a toothed drill was completed by means of curettage. Resection was considered radiologically complete (Fig 3d) in 31 cases (82%) and partial in seven (18%).

Histology
The bone fragment sampled could be analyzed in all cases. If the nidus appeared fragmented, histologic confirmation of the diagnosis was certain or very probable in 28 cases (74%). Complete excision of the lesion was confirmed in 21 cases (55%). However, at histologic examination no nidus was found in the excised specimen in four cases (11%). In addition, at histologic analysis the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was eliminated formally in six cases (16%), and a different type of bone involvement was revealed. These lesions were two intraosseous mucoid cysts, one subchondral geode of degenerative arthritic type, one benign fibromatous tumor, one focal osteochondritis, and one focal chronic osteomyelitis (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Differential Diagnosis at Histologic Analysis
 
Among patients who were cured, four distinct groups were defined at histopathologic analysis. In group 1, the nidus was present and complete. In group 2, the nidus was present, but it was not possible to conclude as to the totality of excision. In group 3, no lesion that appeared to be an osteoid osteoma was found. In group 4, histologic examination revealed a lesion of a different type.

Clinical Course
Pain disappeared durably and completely in 32 of the 38 patients treated. This was the equivalent of a cure rate of 84% for a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. If we excluded the patients whose histologic finding was not osteoid osteoma, the cure rate was about 88% (28 of 32). In most cases (68% [26 of 38]), pain relief was obtained as soon as the patient awakened from anesthesia.

Hospitalization lasted a mean of 4.8 days (range, 2–21 days), and patients were able to use or to bear weight on the extremity at a mean of 30 days. In our series, the patients treated surgically had a much longer hospital stay, but this is not comparable as these cases were therapeutic failures after percutaneous resection. Sporting activities were resumed completely after a mean of 112 days (range, 15 days to 1 year), a period which varied markedly according to the area initially involved.

Treatment failed in four cases, with the return of pain similar in nature and intensity to the pain before the procedure. The interval before the reappearance of pain varied: early in two cases (3 and 7 days) and later in two other cases (6 and 18 months). A curative surgical procedure was performed in three cases; in the fourth case, a second percutaneous excision was performed, which completely and durably eliminated clinical symptoms.

Other Diagnoses
Six bone lesions of a different nature were revealed, and these lesions followed two different courses. Either pain persisted with intensity similar to that of the pain before percutaneous resection (n = 2), or there was clinical cure with complete elimination of pain. Four lesions followed this favorable course: one intraosseous mucoid cyst, one focal osteochondritis, one focal chronic osteomyelitis, and one arthritic geode.

Complications
Nine patients (24%) presented with complications (Table 3). The mean duration before occurrence of complications was 40 days (range, 1–150 days). We differentiated early complications (five cases), which occurred within 2 weeks after the procedure, from later complications (four cases). The early complications were usually local and resolved rapidly, and they were mainly skin burns around the entry site of the resection instruments. In a single case, in a 6-year-old child, superficial thermal damage deepened and became secondarily infected, requiring daily local care for 2 months. Five years after the procedure, the child had no sequelae except an extensive scar on the tibia where the lesion was resected.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Short- and Long-Term Complications
 
Muscular hematomas occurred during the course of excision in two cases. In the first case, secondary surgical evacuation was necessary owing to hematoma of the quadriceps muscle during resection of an osteoid osteoma of the femoral shaft. In the second case, a hematoma of the psoas muscle after resection of a spinal lesion resolved spontaneously.

Later complications were often more severe. A case of focal chronic osteomyelitis due to S aureus occurred 25 days postoperatively. A fracture of the femoral shaft occurred 2 months postoperatively, and a stress fracture of the femoral neck occurred 5 months postoperatively. The last complication was a late but more benign case of dysesthesia along the course of the femoral cutaneous nerve.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Osteoid osteoma is a benign tumor in the young adult. It is located preferentially in the shaft of the long bones near the metaphyseal junctions, with a predilection for the lower limbs (5). The clinical manifestations are generally typical—nocturnal pain that prevents sleep and that is relieved with acetylsalicylic acid. Conventional radiolographs and CT scans generally suffice to establish the diagnosis, which is already strongly suggested by the clinical picture.

CT has led to a marked advance in the rapidity and reliability of diagnosis after the first clinical signs. It also provides precise localization of the lesion and indication of the size of the nidus. These parameters orient the therapeutic strategy: either surgical excision or excision and percutaneous destruction with CT guidance. When the approach to the osteoma is not without risk, in particular near the course of vessels and nerves, we merely localize it precisely, perhaps by inserting a small-diameter pin, and the tumor is secondarily resected surgically.

While these various imaging techniques allow precise diagnosis, the interval before diagnosis is still astonishingly long (a mean of 1.6 years in our series) and does not seem to have notably decreased in comparison with that in other series in the literature (1,2,5). Every possible means thus must be used to find the osteoma at the slightest clinical suspicion.

Although this tumor may regress spontaneously after some years (7,8), excision is often necessary to relieve the patient and is justified by the necessity of obtaining histologic confirmation. En bloc resection was long the only surgical technique enabling resection of the entire nidus and complete cure. This mode of resection is not always necessary, but it is important to note the difficulties of the surgery or even the damage it can cause in certain locations such as the deep posterior acetabulum.

In spite of the various methods used to localize the nidus during the procedure, this may be difficult and require wide bone excision disproportionate to the small size of the lesion and sometimes is followed by osteosynthesis and bone grafting.

The development of CT-guided percutaneous treatment techniques, associated if necessary with scintigraphic localization (9), has profoundly modified the treatment of osteoid osteoma. Leaving aside the contraindications related to anesthesia and coagulation disorders, the contraindications seem to be nonindications. These are large lesions (>15 mm in diameter) or lesions that cannot be reached without jeopardizing vessels or nerves. In such cases, we merely localize the nidus and perhaps insert a pin.

On the other hand, in the majority of cases (>90% [35 of 38]) the osteoid osteoma was in a superficial or cortical location. A tumor that is endosteal or within the marrow cavity is in no way an obstacle to percutaneous resection. In most cases, percutaneous ablation will remove both the superficial and deep cortical bone (Fig 3d).

Successful Treatments
Treatment by means of CT-guided percutaneous resection appears to be effective. Clinical cure was obtained in 84% of patients and in 88% if patients whose lesion was not an osteoid osteoma are excluded. Four patients were not cured with the first resection and required either a second resection or surgical removal of the lesion.

Among the patients who were cured, four distinct groups were defined at histologic analysis. In group 1, the nidus was present and complete at histologic examination. Cure was complete and the risk of recurrence is nil. This was the case in 21 patients in our series.

In group 2, the nidus was present at histologic examination, but it was not possible to conclude as to the totality of excision because the nidus appeared fragmented or incomplete. Although these patients (three in our series) have been free of symptoms since excision, risk of recurrence in this type of patient cannot be neglected.

In group 3, no lesion was found that appeared to be an osteoid osteoma at histologic examination. This was the case in four patients in our series. These patients presented with clinical and radiologic signs strongly suggestive of osteoid osteoma; in two, pain disappeared immediately after awakening from anesthesia. In the third patient, pain progressively lessened and disappeared about 1 month after treatment. At the present time, these four patients are completely free of symptoms. This leads us to think that in these cases the nidus was probably excised but was not found at histologic examination.

Several hypotheses may explain this phenomenon (10). First, the nidus may have been fragmented during excision, which would make histologic study difficult or impossible.

Second, the nidus was present and not fragmented within the material sent to the laboratory but was not found during examination. When the nidus is very small, only very thin serial sections allow its identification by the pathologist.

Third, the nidus was not resected. In this case, clinical cure may be explained by the theory of Jackson et al (11). According to these authors, surgical treatment may cause traumatic thrombosis of the vessels of the nidus, and this thrombosis may then be responsible for infarction of the lesion and lead to clinical cure. It could be suggested that, like surgery, percutaneous resection may cause lesional trauma. This would explain the fact that the pain decreases progressively and then disappears.

Fourth, it is possible that the nidus was not resected and not infarcted. In this case, the relief from pain could be a result of the decompression that occurs when the lesion is opened; this decrease in intralesional pressure then provides temporary elimination of pain. Progressive regrowth of the lesion accounts for the return of pain in the short or medium term. The risk of recurrence appears to be greatest in such a context.

Last, in the absence of histologic certainty, the possibility cannot be excluded that these three patients had a histologically different lesion, like the patients of group 4.

In group 4, histologic examination revealed a lesion of a different type. Of the six patients who did not have an osteoid osteoma, four obtained durable relief after percutaneous resection (one old focal chronic osteomyelitis, two intraosseous mucoid cysts, and one osteochondritis). Certain authors (12) have raised the hypothesis that if histologic examination cannot lead to a conclusion of osteoid osteoma, the clinical features, imaging findings, and above all the notion of immediate cure after the procedure, will establish the diagnosis. These four examples suggest that a lesion that is cured by means of percutaneous resection and that presents the radiologic and clinical characteristics of an osteoid osteoma may in fact be a bone lesion of a different nature, and a definite diagnosis can be reached only at histologic study.

In the six cases in which the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma had been presumed erroneously, retrospective analysis of the records always revealed an atypical element, whether in clinical, scintigraphic, radiologic, or CT findings. Moreover, the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma is rare after the age of 45 years and exceptional after 65 years. More advanced age is an atypical factor, which we found in patients 2, 25, and 26 in our study; a differential diagnosis of osteoid osteoma was made at histologic examination. The relative simplicity of the resection procedure and its low morbidity rate have contributed to the increase in the number of indications for this method of treatment. Moreover, the fact that the biopsy procedure and the therapeutic procedure are indissociably linked also indirectly increases the number of indications; if the lesion is small, percutaneous resection allows not only good quality histologic analysis but also total excision.

These diagnostic errors emphasize the necessity for histologic confirmation, even when clinical examination and medical imaging results appear typical (8). This incites us to remain prudent and to weigh carefully the indications for treatments that do not permit histologic confirmation: laser photocoagulation (13), alcoholization (14), and simple trituration or ablation with radio-frequency electrodes (15).

Unsuccessful Treatments
Treatment has failed if pain persists or recurs after excision (16), and this reflects incomplete ablation of the nidus. The number of recurrences decreases with time, but recurrences may occur very late—up to 10 years later in one case in the literature (17). In our series, the failure rate seems acceptable (16% [six of 38]), taking into account the simplicity of application and performance of the technique. The main source of failure seems to be the large size of the lesion, and this is one of the limitations of the technique. Thus, in two cases, resection was incomplete because the size of the lesion (21 and 25 mm) was disproportionate to the size of the material excised with a Kohler toothed drill with a 9-mm outer diameter (Fig 1). The follow-up CT scan performed at the end of the procedure showed that in these two cases the nidus had not been removed completely. However, resection had to be interrupted because of the risk of fracture.

To our knowledge, there are no objective criteria for assessing fracture risk at the time of or during percutaneous resection. According to Caillieret et al (12), the risk is high when resection includes the deep cortex of a long bone shaft, and osteosynthesis is desirable in such cases. From our experience, a lesion larger than 15 mm appears difficult to extract, extraction is often incomplete, and repeated resections are required. The occurrence of fracture, in particular in long bones, also seems correlated with the amount of cortical bone resected. In such cases, removal of the osteoid osteoma should be performed by means of directed surgery after placing a pin in the nidus with CT guidance.

Preventive osteosynthesis is performed according to the location and volume of resection. In such cases, primary surgical treatment seems preferable so that osteosynthesis can be performed if necessary in the course of the same procedure. However, as it is difficult to localize the nidus during surgery, some teams continue to use percutaneous resection in large lesions and associate it at the end of the procedure with destruction of the nidus by means of trituration or alcoholization.

According to the theory of McLeod et al (18), lesions more than 15 mm in diameter may be potentially malignant osteoblastomas. In such cases, treatment must always be surgical and oncologically satisfactory (19).

Complications
The complications we observed were in general early and minor. Skin burns occurred immediately after the procedure at the entry site of the resection instruments; they were due to the heat caused by the high rotation speed of the toothed drill. These minor complications most frequently observed in our series usually required only treatment of symptoms and resolved without sequelae. When we were aware of this complication, we were able to decrease its frequency by means of constant surveillance of the state of the skin during resection.

Irritation of the femoral cutaneous nerve occurred twice during resection of osteoid osteomas of the femoral neck. The femoral cutaneous nerve gives rise to a femoral branch that runs in the superficial planes of the lateral inguinofemoral region, which it innervates. Planning the course of resection on the initial CT scan makes it possible to avoid only the major nerve and vascular trunks. Patients who had this complication still had hypoesthesia in the territory of the affected nerve up to 3 years after the procedure.

Hematomas were unpredictable and seemed to be unavoidable. They were generally of moderate size and regressed spontaneously, only exceptionally requiring secondary surgical evacuation.

Major complications mainly were femoral fractures. Bone resection in these two cases was not extensive—the bone defect was less than 10 mm in diameter—but these fractures appeared to be related to resumption of professional or sporting activities too early and against medical advice.

We had one patient with focal chronic osteomyelitis due to S aureus, which occurred 25 days after the procedure. This emphasizes the necessity for strict surgical asepsis in the CT room throughout any resection procedure.

The results of this study confirm the medium-term efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous resection of osteoid osteomas. This technique allows minimal and generally complete bone resection owing to precise and reliable localization. Hospital stay is reduced to 2 or 3 days, and weight-bearing and physical activity can be resumed at an early date. In comparison with other treatment methods that are being developed, with this method histologic confirmation of the lesion is obtained in the majority of cases, and we believe this is indispensable. These varied reasons tend to widen the indications for percutaneous resection, which we believe should be considered as first-line therapy if it seems technically possible. However, it would seem permissible to resect only lesions with a diameter of less than 10 mm. This study also shows that percutaneous resection may be useful in treating other small localized bone lesions.


    Footnotes
 
Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, N.S., J.J.R.; study concepts, N.S., D.G.F., J.A., J.J.R., P.B., N.R.; study design, N.S., J.J.R.; definition of intellectual content, N.S., J.J.R.; literature research, N.S., J.J.R., T.J., H.C., J.G.; clinical studies, N.S., D.G.F., J.A., H.M.M., J.J.R.; experimental studies, N.S., H.M.M., J.J.R.; data acquisition, N.S., H.M.M., J.J.R.; data analysis, N.S.; manuscript preparation and editing, N.S., T.J., H.C., J.G.; manuscript review, N.S., J.G.


    References
 TOP
 Abstract
 Introduction
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Voto SJ, Cook AJ, Weiner DS, Ewing JW, Arrington LE. Treatment of osteoid osteoma by computed tomography guided excision in the pediatric patient. J Pediatr Orthop 1990; 10:510-513.[Medline]
  2. Kohler R, Mazoyer JF, Besse JL, Bascoulergue Y. Treatment of osteoid osteoma with percutaneous resection under computerized tomography control: apropos of 5 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Réparatrice Appar Mot 1990; 76:284-287[French].
  3. Poey C, Clement JL, Baunin C, et al. Percutaneous extraction of an osteoid osteoma of the lumbar spine under CT guidance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991; 15:1056-1058.[Medline]
  4. Poey J, Assoun J, Duparc B, et al. Percutaneous extraction of osteoid osteoma. Semin Intervent Radiol 1993; 10:308-315.
  5. Assoun J, Railhac JJ, Bonnevialle P, et al. Osteoid osteoma: percutaneous resection with CT guidance. Radiology 1993; 188:541-547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Baunin C, Puget C, Assoun J, et al. Percutaneous resection of osteoid osteoma under CT guidance in eight children. Pediatr Radiol 1994; 24:185-188.[Medline]
  7. Moberg E. The natural course of osteoid osteoma. J Bone Joint Surg 1951; 33:166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Sim FH, Dahlin CD, Beabout JW. Osteoid osteoma: diagnostic problems. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1975; 57:154-158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Roger B, Bellin MF, Wioland M, Grenier P. Osteoid osteoma: CT-guided percutaneous excision confirmed with immediate follow-up scintigraphy in 16 outpatients. Radiology 1996; 201:239-242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ward WG, Eckardt JJ, Shayestehfar S, et al. Osteoid osteoma diagnosis and management with low morbidity. Clin Orthop 1993; 291:229-235.
  11. Jackson RP, Reckling FW, Mantz FA. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Clin Orthop 1977; 128:303-313.
  12. Caillieret J, Fontaine C, Ducloux M, Letendart J, Duquennoy A. Ostéomes ostéoïdes de l'extrémité supérieure du fémur. Rev Chir Orthop 1985; 72(suppl 2):101-103.
  13. Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Gasser B, et al. Interstitial laser photocoagulation of osteoid osteomas with use of CT guidance. Radiology 1997; 203:843-848.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Sanhaji L, Gharbaoui IS, Hassani RE, et al. Un nouveau traitement de l'ostéome ostéoïde: la sclérose percutanée à l'éthanol sous guidage scanographique. J Radiol 1996; 77:37-40.[Medline]
  15. Rosenthal DI, Alexander A, Rosenberg AE, Springfield D. Ablation of osteoid osteomas with a percutaneously placed electrode: a new procedure. Radiology 1992; 183:29-33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Railhac JJ, Assoun J, Poey C, et al. Ablation percutanée des ostéomes osteoïdes sous contrôle tomodensitométrique. Rev Imagerie Med 1992; 4:463-470.
  17. Regan MW, Galey JP, Oakeshott RD. Recurrent osteoid osteoma: case report with a ten-year asymptomatic interval. Clin Orthop 1990; 253:221-224.
  18. McLeod RA, Dahlin DC, Beabout JW. The spectrum of osteoblastoma. AJR 1976; 126:321-335.[Abstract]
  19. Gitelis S, Schajowicz F. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Orthop Clin North Am 1989; 20:313-325.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
A. A. Malik, S. Trevalyan, W. S. Khan, A. Hughes, J.C. Hill, and D.R.M. Redfern
New techniques for localisation and excision of osteoid osteoma
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., June 1, 2008; 33(3): 389 - 391.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. Abnousi, J. D. Saliman, and G. S. Fanton
Arthroscopic Visualization and Assisted Excision of Osteoid Osteoma at the Knee: A Case Report and Review
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 375 - 378.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Gangi, H. Alizadeh, L. Wong, X. Buy, J.-L. Dietemann, and C. Roy
Osteoid Osteoma: Percutaneous Laser Ablation and Follow-up in 114 Patients
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 242(1): 293 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. P. Cantwell, J. O'Byrne, and S. Eustace
Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma with cooled probes and impedance-control energy delivery.
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2006; 186(5 Suppl): S244 - S248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. G. Bitsch, R. Rupp, L. Bernd, and K. Ludwig
Osteoid Osteoma in an ex Vivo Animal Model: Temperature Changes in Surrounding Soft Tissue during CT-guided Radiofrequency Ablation
Radiology, December 1, 2005; 238(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. I. Rosenthal, F. J. Hornicek, M. Torriani, M. C. Gebhardt, and H. J. Mankin
Osteoid Osteoma: Percutaneous Treatment with Radiofrequency Energy
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 171 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Vanderschueren, A. H. M. Taminiau, W. R. Obermann, and J. L. Bloem
Osteoid Osteoma: Clinical Results with Thermocoagulation
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 82 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. Feletar and S. Hall
Osteoid osteoma: a case for conservative management
Rheumatology, May 1, 2002; 41(5): 585 - 586.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J.-C. Hoeffel and N. Sans
Percutaneous Excision of Osteoid Osteoma Dr Sans responds:
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 302 - 303.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sans, N.
Right arrow Articles by Railhac, J.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sans, N.
Right arrow Articles by Railhac, J.-J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE