Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online before print December 2, 2002, 10.1148/radiol.2261011704
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2261011704v1
226/1/47    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bosniak, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bosniak, M. A.
(Radiology 2003;226:47-52.)
© RSNA, 2002


Genitourinary Imaging

Calcification in Cystic Renal Masses: Is It Important in Diagnosis?1

Gary M. Israel, MD and Morton A. Bosniak, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, 560 First Ave, Suite HW 202, New York, NY 10016. From the 2001 RSNA scientific assembly. Received October 17, 2001; revision requested January 10, 2002; final revision received April 29; accepted April 30. Address correspondence to G.M.I. (e-mail: gary.israel@med.nyu.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To determine whether the presence of calcifications in cystic renal masses is important in diagnosis and to suggest an approach to the management of calcified cystic renal masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one cystic renal masses containing calcification in a wall or septum were evaluated by means of review of computed tomographic (CT) images (n = 81), follow-up CT images (n = 28), and results of pathologic examination (n = 40) by the authors in consensus. Images were evaluated for lesion size, amount and morphology of calcification, and any association of calcification with soft-tissue structures. Lesions were categorized according to the Bosniak cyst classification system; the amount of calcification was determined with a subjective grading system. Progression of calcification was qualitatively determined with available follow-up CT scans.

RESULTS: Twenty-one lesions were Bosniak category II (benign) and showed small amounts and thin strands of calcification. Nineteen lesions containing more extensive calcification but no enhancing tissue were category IIF. Follow-up CT results available for 16 of these lesions (average follow-up length, 5 years 8 months) showed no substantial change. The three remaining lesions were proved benign at surgery. Twenty-five lesions were category III; surgical intervention was performed in 21 of these (benign, n = 12; malignant, n = 9). Sixteen lesions that contained obvious areas of enhancing soft tissue were category IV and proved malignant at surgery.

CONCLUSION: Calcification in a cystic renal mass is not as important in diagnosis as is the presence of associated enhancing soft-tissue elements. This information should enable a reasonable approach to the management of calcium-containing renal cystic lesions.

© RSNA, 2002

Index terms: Kidney, calcification, 81.814, 81.816 • Kidney, cysts, 81.3111, 81.3112 • Kidney neoplasms, CT, 81.12112


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Calcification in a solid renal mass has traditionally been considered to indicate a malignant process (1). However, calcifications can be seen in benign as well as malignant cystic renal masses (1). The majority of renal cysts encountered in daily radiologic practice represent uncomplicated cysts and are easy to diagnose. However, differentiating between benign complicated cysts and those requiring surgical intervention may be difficult and lead to differences in opinion among radiologists and clinicians (25). The presence of calcification may influence the decision to surgically explore or follow up a lesion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether calcification in cystic renal masses is important in diagnosis and to suggest an approach to the management of calcified cystic renal masses.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients and Imaging
This was a retrospective study in which we searched a computerized radiology database that has been compiled at our institution since 1988 with the key words kidney, cyst, calcification, and neoplasm; we also searched a pathology database that has been compiledat our institution since 1996 for all calcified cystic renal masses. These cases were supplemented with additional material from our teaching files and with data from computed tomographic (CT) examinations sent to us from outside institutions for consultation. This process yielded records of a total of 83 masses in 81 patients.

Two patients who were believed to have Bosniak category IIF cysts (ie, complex renal cysts in need of follow-up—see below) were excluded from the study because follow-up examination results or pathologic data were not available. This yielded a total of 79 patients and 81 masses. There were 49 men and 30 women, with an average age of 64.2 years (23-86 years). For each patient who did not undergo surgery, attempts were made to obtain data from all subsequent CT examinations to ensure the longest possible follow-up; such data were available for 28 lesions. Pathologic correlation was available for 40 lesions, two of which had also been examined at follow-up CT before surgery. The remaining 15 lesions were diagnosed as benign (category II) on the basis of their appearance at CT.

The Institutional Board of Research Associates at New York University School of Medicine reviewed the manuscript of our study, determined that our study was a retrospective review of medical records that was unlikely to result in harm to subjects, and permitted the use of the data we collected for publication of this report.

Given the nature of this study, the examinations were performed with a variety of helical and conventional CT scanners with different section collimations (range, 3-10 mm). In addition, the type and amount of contrast material used varied, but all examinations were performed before and after intravenous administration of contrast material, with the exception of a single follow-up examination of one category II lesion.

Image Analysis
The images in each case were retrospectively analyzed by the authors (G.M.I., M.A.B.) in consensus. Images from the original examination were initially evaluated, and, if images from subsequent examinations were available, they were analyzed side-by-side with those of the original examination. For each cystic mass, its Bosniak classification, its greatest size in two dimensions as measured with hand-held calipers, and the amount of calcification it contained were determined. In addition, for those masses for which results of follow-up examinations were available, any change in the amount of calcification was determined. Comparison of the images with surgical findings and surgical pathologic findings was performed by the authors on the basis of surgical and pathology reports. This information was available to one of the authors (M.A.B.) prior to the consensus review.

All lesions were placed in a Bosniak cyst category (2) on the basis of the following criteria:

Category I masses are simple benign cysts with thin walls; they contain fluid with the attenuation of water but do not contain septa or calcification.

Category II masses are benign cystic lesions that may contain hairline-thin septa. Fine calcification in the walls or septa of such lesions or a short segment of slightly thickened calcification is not uncommon and is compatible with benignity. Minimal enhancement of a hairline-thin, smooth septum or wall is sometimes present.

Category IIF lesions are more complex cysts that cannot be classified neatly as being category II or category III cysts. These cysts may contain an increased number of septa and an increased amount of calcification, which may be thicker and nodular. Like category II cysts, these lesions may demonstrate minimal enhancement of a hairline-thin, smooth septum or wall but no enhancement of the tissues in which calcification is present.

Category III lesions are indeterminate masses, in that their benignity or malignancy cannot be determined with imaging studies. These lesions have thick, irregular walls or septa, and may contain either small or large amounts of calcification. Enhancement of the wall or septa can be clearly appreciated.

Category IV lesions are malignant cystic masses containing either small or large amounts of calcification within a thick, enhancing irregular wall or septum. Enhancing soft-tissue components are present adjacent to or extending from, but are independent of, the wall or septum.

To determine the amount of calcification within each mass, a subjective scoring system of 1–4 was used. A score of 1 was assigned for minimal calcification, and scores of 2, 3, and 4 were assigned for mild, moderate, and severe calcification, respectively. Minimal calcification was defined as smooth, hairline-thin strands of calcification. Mild calcification was defined as calcification with some thickness and minimal nodularity. Moderate calcification was defined as calcification with further thickness and/or a grossly nodular appearance. Severe calcification was defined as grossly thickened, nodular, and extensive calcification.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Category II Cysts
There were a total of 21 category II cysts, with an average size of 5.7 x 4.7 cm (Figs 1, 2). All of these lesions contained calcium, and the average calcification score was 1.4 (range, 1–2). For six of the lesions, results of follow-up CT examinations were available; the average duration of follow-up for these lesions was 5 years 1 month (range, 1 year 6 months to 10 years; median, 4 years). In one lesion that was followed up for 9 years, the amount of calcification increased slightly but did not exceed a score of 2. There was no change in the remaining five lesions. As expected, pathologic results were not available for any of the category II lesions.



View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Contrast material-enhanced transverse CT scan in a 73-year-old man with a category II cyst depicts a cystic lesion with an area of minimally thickened but smooth linear calcification (arrow) within a septum. No enhancement of associated tissues is present (calcification score: 2).

 


View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan in a 71-year-old man with a category II cyst depicts multiple but very thin calcified septa (arrows). No enhancement of associated tissues is present (calcification score: 1).

 
Category IIF Cysts
There were a total of 19 category IIF cysts, with an average size of 3.3 x 2.8 cm. All of these lesions contained calcium, and the average calcification score was 3.1 (range, 2–4). Three lesions were surgically proved to be hemorrhagic cysts with no evidence of malignancy. The patients with these three lesions underwent surgery either because of patient (n = 1) or urologist (n = 1) preference or because of "overcall" by the radiologist, who believed the lesion to be a category III cyst (n = 1).

For the remaining 16 cases without pathologic correlation, the average duration of follow-up was 5 years 8 months (range, 1 year 1 month to 17 years 4 months; median, 5 years) (Figs 35). In four of the cases, the amount of calcification increased during the follow-up period (Fig 3). In the remaining 12 cases, the calcification did not change. In the patient who underwent repeat CT examinations during a follow-up period of 17 years 4 months, an initial calcification score of 2 was increased to a score of 4 at the last follow-up examination (Fig 4).



View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Images in a 51-year-old woman with a category IIF lesion. (a) Initial contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan demonstrates a complex calcified cystic mass (arrows) without enhancing components (calcification score: 3). The patient did not receive a full dose of intravenous contrast material because she had mild renal insufficiency, which accounts for the poor nephrogram. (b) On a nonenhanced transverse CT scan obtained nine years after a, the amount of calcification has increased but the lesion is unchanged in size (calcification score: 4).

 


View larger version (143K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Images in a 51-year-old woman with a category IIF lesion. (a) Initial contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan demonstrates a complex calcified cystic mass (arrows) without enhancing components (calcification score: 3). The patient did not receive a full dose of intravenous contrast material because she had mild renal insufficiency, which accounts for the poor nephrogram. (b) On a nonenhanced transverse CT scan obtained nine years after a, the amount of calcification has increased but the lesion is unchanged in size (calcification score: 4).

 


View larger version (165K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a. Images of a category IIF lesion in a 60-year-old man who was followed up for 17 years 4 months. (a) Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan obtained in 1981 depicts a bilobular cystic renal mass (long arrows) with nodular calcification (short arrows) (calcification score: 2). No enhancing tissue is identifiable within the mass. (b) Unenhanced transverse CT scan obtained in 1998 reveals that calcification (arrows) has progressed within the mass (calcification score: 4). No enhancement was demonstrated on contrast-enhanced images (not shown).

 


View larger version (175K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b. Images of a category IIF lesion in a 60-year-old man who was followed up for 17 years 4 months. (a) Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan obtained in 1981 depicts a bilobular cystic renal mass (long arrows) with nodular calcification (short arrows) (calcification score: 2). No enhancing tissue is identifiable within the mass. (b) Unenhanced transverse CT scan obtained in 1998 reveals that calcification (arrows) has progressed within the mass (calcification score: 4). No enhancement was demonstrated on contrast-enhanced images (not shown).

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5a. Images in a 72-year-old man with a category IIF lesion. (a) Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan depicts a 2-cm mass (straight arrows) in the left kidney with thick mural calcification (curved arrows) (calcification score: 3). There are no enhancing soft-tissue components. A simple cyst (C) is present posteriorly. (b) A follow-up contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan obtained 4 years 10 months after a reveals that the mass is stable and is most consistent with a benign cyst.

 


View larger version (149K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5b. Images in a 72-year-old man with a category IIF lesion. (a) Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan depicts a 2-cm mass (straight arrows) in the left kidney with thick mural calcification (curved arrows) (calcification score: 3). There are no enhancing soft-tissue components. A simple cyst (C) is present posteriorly. (b) A follow-up contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan obtained 4 years 10 months after a reveals that the mass is stable and is most consistent with a benign cyst.

 
Category III Cysts
There were a total of 25 category III cysts, with an average size of 6 x 5.1 cm. All of these lesions contained calcium, and the average calcification score was 2.1 (range, 1-4). Surgical correlation was available in 21 patients, nine of whom had renal cell carcinoma (Fig 6); 11, a benign hemorrhagic or infected cyst (Figs 7, 8); and one, a benign multilocular cystic nephroma. In the remaining four patients, in whom there was no surgical correlation, the average duration of follow-up was 3 years 1 month (range, 7 months to 4 years 3 months; median, 3 years 9 months), and the amount of calcification remained unchanged during the follow-up period. These patients did not undergo surgical exploration owing to the presence of coexisting medical conditions.



View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan in a 75-year-old woman with a category III lesion depicts a complex cystic lesion with thick mural calcification (straight arrows) and a thick, enhancing wall (curved arrow) (calcification score: 3). Nephrectomy was performed, and pathologic examination revealed a cystic renal cell carcinoma.

 


View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7. Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan in a 42-year-old woman with a category III lesion, fever, leukocytosis, right flank pain, and a history of urinary tract infection depicts an irregular cystic mass with a thick, enhancing wall (short arrows) and mural calcification (long arrow) (calcification score: 2). Because of the probability of infection, the lesion was aspirated, and pus was recovered. Catheter drainage was then instituted as treatment. The diminished quality of the nephrogram is due to a slow injection of a low dose of contrast material.

 


View larger version (150K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8a. Images in a 55-year-old man with a category III lesion, a history of automobile trauma, and multiple inferior right rib fractures. (a) Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan depicts a cystic lesion that extends from the lower pole of the right kidney. The lesion has a thick, enhancing wall (short arrows) and mural calcification (long arrow) (calcification score: 2). (b) Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan obtained approximately 5 cm cephalad to a reveals that the lesion is immediately adjacent to a previously fractured rib (arrow). Because of the likelihood that this lesion was posttraumatic, the surgical approach was modified to exploratory. The lesion was resected, and a benign hemorrhagic cyst was diagnosed.

 


View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8b. Images in a 55-year-old man with a category III lesion, a history of automobile trauma, and multiple inferior right rib fractures. (a) Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan depicts a cystic lesion that extends from the lower pole of the right kidney. The lesion has a thick, enhancing wall (short arrows) and mural calcification (long arrow) (calcification score: 2). (b) Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan obtained approximately 5 cm cephalad to a reveals that the lesion is immediately adjacent to a previously fractured rib (arrow). Because of the likelihood that this lesion was posttraumatic, the surgical approach was modified to exploratory. The lesion was resected, and a benign hemorrhagic cyst was diagnosed.

 
Category IV Cysts
There were a total of 16 category IV cysts, with an average size of 5.6 x 4.9 cm. All of the lesions contained calcium, and the average calcification score was 2.2 (range, 1–4). In all cases, a malignant neoplasm (renal cell carcinoma) was revealed at pathologic analysis (Fig 9).



View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9. Contrast-enhanced transverse CT scan in an 86-year-old woman with a category IV lesion depicts a complex cystic mass with mural calcification (long arrow), wall enhancement, and obvious enhancing soft-tissue components (short arrow) adjacent to the wall (calcification score: 3). At surgery, this lesion was revealed to be a cystic renal cell carcinoma.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The differentiation of benign cystic lesions of the kidney from those that require surgical management is a common and often difficult problem. In general, there is no difficulty in differentiating a simple cyst from a malignant cystic neoplasm. However, complex cystic masses have a variety of appearances, and accurate classification of their appearance is helpful in determining their proper management. In 1986, Bosniak (2) described a categorization system that was designed to help radiologists determine which cystic lesions require surgical treatment and which do not. Since that time, results of numerous studies (69) have validated the usefulness of this classification scheme.

Calcification can occur in the wall or the septa of benign as well as malignant lesions (10,11). In an early description of CT findings in benign calcified cystic masses, it was stated that "small plaques of fine linear calcium can occur in the wall of benign cysts"—that is, cysts in which such a finding is observed can be considered benign if all other CT criteria for benign cysts are present (2). However, more extensive calcification would result in a lesion being upgraded to a category III lesion, which must be explored surgically. This belief was based in part on early experience with these lesions, as well as on the lower degree of detail provided by early CT scanners. However, the results of this study demonstrate that many lesions containing larger amounts of calcium can safely be followed up with serial examinations, as long as enhancing soft-tissue components are not present.

In this study, the largest amount of calcification was observed in category IIF cysts. These lesions could not be placed into category II because of the increased amount of calcium, but they did not demonstrate the type of mural enhancement associated with category III cysts. Category IIF lesions can show minimal enhancement of the wall or septa as long as the wall or septa are hairline thin and smooth. However, if there is any irregularity in an enhancing wall or septum, the lesion must be considered a category III lesion. In some category IIF lesions, it is difficult to visualize mural enhancement because of the large amounts of calcium present within the lesion. Theoretically, the use of subtraction techniques would be extremely helpful in determining whether densely calcified lesions enhance at CT, thereby enabling one to distinguish category IIF from category III lesions.

The use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may also be helpful in characterizing these lesions. Calcification within the wall or septa would not be depicted at MR imaging, and enhancement might be better demonstrated. However, in those cases in which there is indecision as to what category a lesion should be placed into, the lesion should be put in the next higher category. More complicated category II lesions could be placed into category IIF. Likewise, more complicated category IIF lesions should be placed into category III.

In this study, there were 19 category IIF cysts, three of which were surgically proved to be benign. No change during the average follow-up of 5 years 8 months implies that the remaining 16 cysts were benign or nonaggressive. In our experience, cystic lesions generally grow very slowly and tend to metastasize late. Therefore, it was considered safe to follow up these cases with CT, which would reveal any growth or findings of concern. A category IIF cyst may grow slightly overall, but this should not cause concern, because all cysts can grow. Furthermore, the amount of calcification can also increase over time without constituting a cause for concern. However, if the wall or septa become thicker or irregular, with any sign of an increase in soft-tissue components, the lesion would have to be considered a category III or category IV lesion. Four of the category IIF lesions in this series showed increased amounts of calcium at follow-up CT examinations. This was not of concern because no enhancing soft-tissue element was present.

Category III lesions have a wide range of appearances and can be benign or malignant. This study included 21 category III lesions with pathologic correlation. Of these 21 lesions, 11 were benign hemorrhagic or infected cysts, nine were renal cell carcinomas, and one was a multilocular cystic nephroma. The features of some category III lesions are borderline with those of category IV; these category III lesions are more likely to be malignant because they have thicker walls or septa that can simulate a soft-tissue mass.

Even though category III lesions are essentially indeterminate, in those cases that are more likely to be malignant, this concern should be communicated to the clinician; this communication may have an effect on the treatment approach. On the other hand, for category III lesions with thinner walls or septa that are more likely to be benign, it is important to communicate the possibility of benignity to the clinician. Although the criteria for category III lesions are such that a malignant lesion cannot be excluded, the probability that a category III lesion is more likely to be benign is important in patient care. In those instances, the clinician might defer surgery (depending on the clinical parameters) or more vigorously pursue a more conservative approach (eg, partial nephrectomy). Many category III lesions can be handled in this way.

However, there are some category III lesions for which it is impossible to make any firm decision as to benignity or malignancy. Most of these lesions are indeterminate even during gross inspection at surgical exploration or at gross pathologic analysis. It is only after a careful microscopic search that a definite diagnosis of neoplasm can be ruled in or out. Occasionally, even the pathologist is uncertain as to whether such a lesion was a "burnt-out" neoplasm (with few, if any, abnormal cells) or a chronic hemorrhagic cyst without abnormal cells.

Although the Bosniak cyst classification system is based on CT findings, clinical history may be important in the process of making decisions about the treatment of a lesion. For instance, if there is a history of urinary tract infection in a patient with a complicated cystic lesion that would ordinarily be considered a category III lesion, aspiration of the lesion to recover pus or inflammatory debris would be indicated, rather than surgical exploration. Also, trauma—including that caused by previous needle aspiration of a benign cyst—can lead to the formation of a calcified, thick-walled lesion. If such a lesion was initially believed to be a benign cyst, it could be followed up as a category IIF lesion.

Category IV cysts are clearly cystic neoplasms. They are malignant because they contain enhancing soft-tissue components that are adjacent to but separate from the wall of the lesion. The amount and morphology of calcification within these lesions have no bearing on the diagnosis of malignancy.

It should be kept in mind that there are a number of other conditions that may manifest as peripherally calcified or rim-calcified cystic renal masses. Peripherally calcified lesions near the hilum of the kidney could represent renal artery aneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas (10,11). These diagnoses would be evident at CT if a sufficient bolus of contrast material were delivered. Also, an echinococcal cyst sometimes manifests as a peripherally calcified lesion, and, while uncommon in North America, this cyst is endemic in some parts of the world and is sometimes seen in patients who travel or immigrate to the United States (12,13). Furthermore, in patients with localized tuberculosis, the calcified wall of a hydrocalyx may manifest as a calcified cystic mass. If a history of tuberculosis is not obtained, a careful search for clues of previous tuberculosis infection, such as an amputated calyx, may prove helpful in diagnosis.

This study had several limitations. First, the results of the CT examinations were retrospectively collected; this introduced a case-selection bias, so the group of cysts we evaluated may not be all inclusive. This is particularly true of category II cysts with minimal calcification. They may not have been recorded in the database for inclusion in this series because they were clearly benign and therefore did not require follow-up CT examinations or surgical exploration.

Second, the lesions were analyzed in consensus, and therefore, interobserver variability could not be accessed. In addition, the CT protocol was not standardized in all patients. Optimizing the parameters of the CT examination would enable more accurate lesion characterization. Although CT was performed before and after intravenous administration of contrast material in all patients in our series (with the exception of a single examination in one patient), not all CT examinations were performed with collimation of 5 mm or less. In some early CT examinations performed at our institution, and in some of the CT examinations performed at other institutions, 10-mm-thick sections were used.

Also, papillary cystadenocarcinoma–type lesions are typically hypovascular and can be missed if the CT examination is performed too early after contrast material administration. For some of the submitted cases, only CT images obtained during the corticomedullary phase of enhancement were available. In general, because the lesions discussed in this article tended to be hypovascular, it is important for images to be acquired at least 90 seconds after contrast material injection to be certain that any vascularity is appreciated (14,15). It has been demonstrated that success in evaluating and accurately characterizing these lesions is dependent on the use of top-quality technique (7). The CT examination must be performed before and after the administration of an adequate amount of intravenous contrast material, and the contrast material should be delivered as a bolus injection to facilitate the evaluation of any possible tissue enhancement. Slow infusion of contrast material may result in low levels of enhancement not being demonstrated at CT.

Another limitation of this study was that pathologic proof was available for only three of the 19 category IIF lesions. Since these lesions are not usually explored surgically, follow-up examinations must be performed to document stability and thus benignity. How long follow-up must be conducted before benignity is proven has not been established, but stability of a lesion during a 5-year period is certainly indicative of benignity. The average duration of CT follow-up of the category IIF lesions in our series was more than 5 years.

Also, we did not systematically analyze the Hounsfield unit values of the contents of each lesion. Radiologists may be more comfortable in categorizing a cystic mass as benign if its contents have the attenuation of fluid. However, many benign lesions contain hemorrhagic fluid, while cystic neoplasms can contain low-attenuating fluid. This issue should not be troublesome, however, because cystic masses should be evaluated before and after the administration of contrast material so that any enhancing component would become evident. Finally, the sample size in our study was relatively small, and additional studies with increased numbers of patients and longer follow-up periods are necessary.

In summary, calcium per se can be seen in benign and malignant cystic lesions. On the basis of the results of this study, calcification in a cystic renal mass is not as important in diagnosis as is the presence of associated enhancing soft-tissue elements. Cystic lesions that show considerable calcification—even thick and nodular calcification—but no evidence of tissue enhancement at CT (category IIF lesions) can be managed with follow-up CT examinations to monitor their stability. Lesions that show associated soft-tissue enhancement of the wall or septa (category III lesions) in most instances must be evaluated surgically, although many of them will prove to be benign.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, G.M.I., M.A.B.; study concepts and design, G.M.I., M.A.B.; literature research, G.M.I., M.A.B.; clinical studies, G.M.I., M.A.B.; data acquisition and analysis/interpretation, G.M.I., M.A.B.; manuscript preparation, definition of intellectual content, editing, revision/review, and final version approval, G.M.I., M.A.B.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Daniel WW, Jr, Hartman GW, Witten DM, Farrow GM, Kelalis PP. Calcified renal masses. Radiology 1972; 103:503-508.[Medline]
  2. Bosniak MA. The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986; 158:1-10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bosniak MA. Difficulties in classifying cystic lesions of the kidney. Urol Radiol 1991; 13:91-93.[Medline]
  4. Bosniak MA. Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:819-821.[Free Full Text]
  5. Bosniak MA. The use of the Bosniak classification system for renal cysts and cystic tumors. J Urol 1997; 157:1852-1853.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Aronson S, Frazier HA, Balwah JD, Hartman DS, Christenson PJ. Cystic renal masses: usefulness of the Bosniak classification. Urol Radiol 1991; 13:83-90.[Medline]
  7. Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:339-342.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Siegel CL, McFarland EG, Brink JA, Fisher AJ, Humphrey P, Heiken JP. CT of cystic renal masses: analysis of diagnostic performance and interobserver variation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:813-818.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Levy P, Helenon O, Merran S, et al. Cystic tumors of the kidney in adults: radio-histopathologic correlations. J Radiol 1999; 80:121-133.[Medline]
  10. Kim WS, Goldman SM, Gatewood OMB, Marshall FF, Siegelman SS. Computed tomography in calcified renal masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1981; 5:855- 860.[Medline]
  11. Weyman PJ, McClennan BL, Lee JKT, Stanley RJ. CT of calcified renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 138:1095-1099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Aragona F, Di Candio G, Serretta V, Fiorentini L. Renal hydatid disease: report of 9 cases and discussion of urologic diagnostic procedures. Urol Radiol 1984; 6:182-186.[Medline]
  13. Volders WK, Gelin G, Stessens RC. Hydatid cyst of the kidney: radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2001; 21:S255-S260.[Free Full Text]
  14. Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Ramchandani P. Multiphasic renal CT: comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiology 1996; 200:753-758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Herts BR, Coll DM, Novick AC, et al. Enhancement characteristics of papillary renal neoplasms revealed on triphasic helical CT of the kidneys. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178:367-372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. G. Silverman, G. M. Israel, B. R. Herts, and J. P. Richie
Management of the Incidental Renal Mass
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 16 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak
Pitfalls in Renal Mass Evaluation and How to Avoid Them
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2008; 28(5): 1325 - 1338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
L R Williams, M J Oldale, and A J Bradley
Imaging renal masses and staging renal tumours
Imaging, March 1, 2008; 20(1): 73 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Zhang, R. A. Lefkowitz, N. M. Ishill, L. Wang, C. S. Moskowitz, P. Russo, H. Eisenberg, and H. Hricak
Solid Renal Cortical Tumors: Differentiation with CT
Radiology, August 1, 2007; 244(2): 494 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
O. Benjaminov, M. Atri, M. O'Malley, K. Lobo, and G. Tomlinson
Enhancing Component on CT to Predict Malignancy in Cystic Renal Masses and Interobserver Agreement of Different CT Features.
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 665 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Israel and M. A. Bosniak
How I Do It: Evaluating Renal Masses
Radiology, August 1, 2005; 236(2): 441 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
D. S. Hartman, P. L. Choyke, and M. S. Hartman
From the RSNA Refresher Courses: A Practical Approach to the Cystic Renal Mass
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2004; 24(suppl_1): S101 - S115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. M. Israel, N. Hindman, and M. A. Bosniak
Evaluation of Cystic Renal Masses: Comparison of CT and MR Imaging by Using the Bosniak Classification System
Radiology, May 1, 2004; 231(2): 365 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. A. Joffe, S. Servaes, S. Okon, and M. Horowitz
Multi-Detector Row CT Urography in the Evaluation of Hematuria
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1441 - 1455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2261011704v1
226/1/47    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bosniak, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Israel, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bosniak, M. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE