Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2271012156
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lund, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lund, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.
(Radiology 2003;227:209-215.)
© RSNA, 2003


Cardiac Imaging

Chronic Heart Failure: Global Left Ventricular Perfusion and Coronary Flow Reserve with Velocity-encoded Cine MR Imaging: Initial Results1

Gunnar K. Lund, MD, Norbert Watzinger, MD, Maythem Saeed, DVM, PhD, Gautham P. Reddy, MD, Ming Yang, MD, Phillip A. Araoz, MD, Dominick Curatola, MD, Martin Bedigian, MD and Charles B. Higgins, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Rm L-308, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628 (G.K.L., N.W., M.S., G.P.R., M.Y., P.A.A., C.B.H.); Altos Cardiovascular, Los Altos, Calif (D.C.); and Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ (M.B.). Received January 14, 2002; revision requested March 5; final revision received August 13; accepted August 26. Supported in part by Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ. G.K.L. supported in part by a scholarship from the University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. N.W. supported by a scholarship from the Max-Kade Foundation, New York, NY. Address correspondence to C.B.H. (e-mail: charles.higgins@radiology.ucsf.edu).


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To quantify and compare global left ventricular (LV) perfusion and coronary flow reserve (CFR) in patients with chronic heart failure and in healthy volunteers by measuring coronary sinus flow with velocity-encoded cine (VEC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR measurements were performed in 10 consecutive patients with chronic heart failure due to coronary artery disease and in 10 volunteers. Global LV perfusion was quantified by measuring coronary sinus flow in an oblique imaging plane perpendicular to the coronary sinus with non–breath-hold VEC MR imaging. LV mass was measured by means of cine imaging that encompassed the heart. LV perfusion was calculated from coronary sinus flow and mass. CFR was measured from LV perfusion at rest and that after infusion of dipyridamole. Analysis of covariance was used to determine differences between groups. Differences within groups were analyzed by means of the Student t test for paired data. Regression analysis was used to determine correlation between CFR and LV ejection fraction.

RESULTS: At rest, LV perfusion was not significantly different in patients with chronic heart failure (0.46 mL/min/g ± 0.19) and volunteers (0.52 mL/min/g ± 0.21, P = .54). After administration of dipyridamole, LV perfusion was less than half in patients with chronic heart failure compared with that in volunteers (1.07 mL/min/g ± 0.64 vs 2.19 mL/min/g ± 0.98) (P = .03). CFR was severely reduced in patients with chronic heart failure compared with that in volunteers (2.3 ± 0.9 vs 4.2 ± 1.5, P = .01). A moderate but significant correlation was found between CFR and LV ejection fraction (r = 0.54, P = .02)

CONCLUSION: Combined cine and VEC MR imaging revealed that patients with chronic heart failure have normal LV perfusion at rest but severely depressed LV perfusion after vasodilation. Impaired CFR may contribute to progressive decline in LV function in patients with chronic heart failure.

© RSNA, 2003

Index terms: Heart, flow dynamics, 50.77, 524.12144, 5475.12144, 58.12144 • Heart, MR, 524.12144, 5475.12144, 58.12144 • Heart, ventricles, 511.12144 • Magnetic resonance (MR), perfusion study, 524.12144, 5475.12144, 58.12144


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Quantification of left ventricular (LV) perfusion has considerably improved the understanding of myocardial blood supply in patients with coronary artery disease (1,2). In general, LV perfusion is reduced as a result of stenosis in epicardial vessels and because the reduction in myocardial blood flow is linearly related to the degree of stenosis in the coronary arteries (1). However, regulation of LV perfusion is less well understood in patients with chronic heart failure. Measurements of LV perfusion in the acute phase of myocardial infarction and those obtained 6 months later show that coronary flow reserve (CFR) is globally and persistently reduced in the infarct region and in the remote noninfarcted myocardium supplied by a nonstenotic artery (3). Furthermore, results in a recent study (4) show that a preserved CFR correlates positively with extent of viable myocardiumafter acute myocardial infarction. Interestingly, patients with diminished myocardial viability in the infarct bed also have a reduced CFR in remote noninfarcted myocardium (4). A global reduction in LV perfusion may be responsible for progressive decline in contractile function and extension of myocardial necrosis. Despite extensive research on cardiac remodeling (5,6), the relationship between cardiac remodeling and LV perfusion is not well understood.

Global LV perfusion can be quantified by measuring coronary sinus flow because the coronary sinus drains a large portion of the LV myocardium (7). Findings in recent studies show the potential of velocity-encoded cine (VEC) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to quantify blood flow in small vessels (8) and to noninvasively measure coronary sinus flow (9,10). In a pulsatile flow phantom study, Arheden et al (8) determined the value of VEC MR imaging in a moving vessel that simulated cardiac motion. They found that VEC MR imaging is accurate in measuring average flow and flow profiles in vessels as small as 6 mm in diameter. Lund et al (9) validated the accuracy of this MR method to quantify coronary sinus flow by using flow probes in dogs. They found a strong correlation between VEC MR measurement of coronary sinus flow and that of the left anterior descending and circumflex coronary arteries. These data indicate that coronary sinus flow at VEC MR imaging represents an excellent surrogate measure of global LV perfusion. Schwitter et al (10) compared coronary sinus flow at VEC MR imaging with measurements of LV perfusion at positron emission tomography (PET) in humans. Good correlation and agreement were found between the two techniques, which emphasizes the value of MR imaging in the quantification of LV perfusion.

The purpose of the current study was to quantify and compare global LV perfusion and CFR in patients with chronic heart failure and in healthy volunteers by measuring coronary sinus flow at VEC MR imaging.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
The institutional ethics committee approved the protocol for the study. All patients and volunteers gave written informed consent before they entered the study. Ten consecutive patients (eight men, two women; mean age, 66 years ± 13 [SD]; age range, 45–83 years) with chronic heart failure and LV dysfunction (ejection fraction of less than 40% at echocardiography at the time of enrollment) underwent MR imaging. Ten volunteers composed the control group (nine men, one woman; mean age, 33 years ± 5; age range, 20–38 years; P = .001 compared with the patients). Volunteers had a normal electrocardiogram and no history of heart or lung disease. Patients with chronic heart failure had a significantly greater body surface area (2.08 m2 ± 0.25) compared with that of volunteers (1.88 m2 ± 0.13) (P = .037). In all patients, selective coronary angiography revealed coronary artery disease as the underlying cause of chronic heart failure. No patient had sustained a myocardial infarction in the previous 6 months, and all patients were free of symptoms of myocardial ischemia at rest. Six patients had mild symptoms of heart failure with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II disease, and four patients had NYHA class III disease. Standard medical treatment of chronic heart failure comprised oral administration of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor in eight (80%) patients, a beta blocker in six (60%), diuretics in four (40%), digoxin in four (40%), and nitrates in three (30%). Treatment with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors was discontinued 5–10 days before the MR examination, and all subjects fasted for 8 hours before the examination.

Cine MR Imaging for LV Mass, Volumes, and Function
All images were acquired with a 1.5-T MR imager (Signa; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) with a phased-array chest coil to improve spatial resolution. Four electrocardiographic leads and bellows were attached to the patient for cardiac gating and respiratory monitoring. Double oblique short-axis images of the left ventricle were acquired in 16 successive cardiac cycles during a one-breath-hold k-space–segmented fast cine MR sequence (FASTCARD; GE Medical Systems). Imaging parameters included the following: 17/2.8 (repetition time msec/echo time msec), section thickness of 10 mm, field of view of 36 x 36 cm, and image matrix of 256 x 256. Nine to 11 contiguous short-axis MR images were acquired from the apex to the base to cover the entire left ventricle. With retrospective gating, 12 images were reconstructed at each anatomic location to represent the cardiac cycle. This data reconstruction strategy resulted in a temporal resolution of 78 msec per image.

VEC MR Imaging for Coronary Sinus Flow Measurement
The coronary sinus was localized in the atrioventricular groove on basal short-axis cine MR images. Coronary sinus flow measurements were obtained with a non–breath-hold VEC phase-contrast gradient-echo sequence with k-space segmentation (Cine PC; GE Medical Systems). The imaging plane was placed perpendicular to the coronary sinus, approximately 2 cm proximal to the entrance of the coronary sinus into the right atrium (10). A retrospective cardiac-gating strategy enabled ongoing data acquisition throughout the cardiac cycle, and frames at the end of the cycle were time resolved, as were those obtained at the beginning (11). Imaging parameters included the following: 27/7.9, flip angle of 30°, section thickness of 5 mm, two signals acquired, field of view of 24 x 24 cm, and image matrix of 256 x 256, which resulted in an in-plane resolution of 0.94 x 0.94 mm. Phase wrap was avoided by means of oversampling of twice the prescribed field of view in the phase-encode direction with two signals acquired. The resulting image was then cropped to keep the center 256 imaging lines with the given size of pixels.

A complete set of VEC MR images was acquired in 5 minutes. Data were sorted according to their occurrence during the cardiac cycle and were interpolated into 16 phase and magnitude images (12). Coronary sinus flow measurements were performed at rest with velocity encoding set to 100 cm/sec. Subsequently, dipyridamole (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, Conn) (0.56 mg per kilogram of body weight) was infused into an antecubital vein over 4 minutes to induce coronary vasodilation. Velocity encoding was changed to 200 cm/sec, and image acquisition was started 2 minutes after administration of dipyridamole to avoid underestimation of peak stress flow. Heart rate and blood pressure were monitored and recorded during the entire protocol. Serious side effects, such as angina pectoris, dyspnea, or ventricular tachycardia, were documented if they occurred after infusion of dipyridamole. After conclusion of the imaging protocol, the effect of dipyridamole was reversed by injecting 75 mg of aminophylline.

Data Analysis
MR images were transferred via Ethernet to a Macintosh computer (Apple Computers, Cupertino, Calif), and data analysis was performed with a public domain program (NIH Image, version 1.59; U.S. National Institutes of Health; available at rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). All MR measurements were performed independently by two of three observers (G.K.L., N.W., M.Y.). Data are given as the mean values for the two observers, and interobserver variability was calculated.

To evaluate LV mass, the epicardial and endocardial borders were manually traced on end-diastolic images to include the papillary muscles at each anatomic level to encompass the left ventricle. LV mass was calculated by summing the myocardial volume areas and multiplying by the density (1.05 mg/mL) of myocardial tissue (13).

Coronary sinus flow was measured by tracing the contour of the coronary sinus on each magnitude image throughout the cardiac cycle (Figs 1, 2). Systole and diastole were determined on the basis of opening and closing of the aortic and mitral valves, which are shown on the magnitude MR images (Fig 1). Care was taken to closely follow the boundary of the vessel identified by a change in signal intensity on magnitude images as a result of surrounding epicardial fat or myocardium (9). The area of coronary sinus was recorded, and the traced region was transferred to corresponding phase images to measure spatial average flow velocity (Fig 2). Phasic blood flow was calculated as the product of area and spatial average flow velocity. Mean volume flow was derived by means of integration of phasic flow over time. Figure 3 shows representative phase images of the area of the coronary sinus and the velocity of coronary sinus blood flow and volume flow in a volunteer and a patient with chronic heart failure.



View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Top row: Long-axis MR images of the heart obtained in a volunteer. Bottom row: Long-axis MR images of the heart obtained in a patient with chronic heart failure. Images were obtained with a non-breath-hold VEC MR sequence. A, Heart is depicted at midsystole with closed mitral valve and open aortic valve. B, Heart is depicted at middiastole with open mitral valve and closed aortic valve. C, Heart is depicted at end diastole with the aortic (black arrow) and mitral (open arrow) valves closed. In all images, the coronary sinus (white arrows) is situated in the atrioventricular grove dorsal to the left atrium. Images were obtained with identical field of view and magnification. Note the marked dilatation of the heart and the coronary sinus in the patient.

 


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Top row: Magnified coronary sinus (arrows) on magnitude MR images. Bottom row: Magnified coronary sinus (arrows) on corresponding phase MR images. Images were obtained in (a) a volunteer and (b) a patient with chronic heart failure. Positive flow velocities are observed during midsystole and middiastole and are represented by hyperintense pixels on phase images.

 


View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Top row: Magnified coronary sinus (arrows) on magnitude MR images. Bottom row: Magnified coronary sinus (arrows) on corresponding phase MR images. Images were obtained in (a) a volunteer and (b) a patient with chronic heart failure. Positive flow velocities are observed during midsystole and middiastole and are represented by hyperintense pixels on phase images.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Graphs depict representative phasic data obtained throughout the cardiac cycle for (a) area of coronary sinus, expressed as the number of pixels measured on magnitude images; (b) velocity of coronary sinus blood flow obtained from phase images; and (c) volume flow calculated as the product of area and velocity. Left graphs represent data from a volunteer, and right graphs depict data from a patient with chronic heart failure. All data are shown at rest ({diamondsuit}) and after infusion of dipyridamole ({circ}). Coronary sinus is depicted with a large number of pixels, which enables close tracing of the vessel throughout the cardiac cycle. Note dilatation of the coronary sinus in the patient. At rest, blood flow velocities show a biphasic pattern, with a first peak during midsystole and a second peak during early diastole. Negative velocities occur at end diastole because of backward flow into the coronary sinus as a result of right atrial contraction. After administration of dipyridamole, the increase in flow velocity is more pronounced in the volunteer, with peak flow velocities at end systole and early diastole. In c, mean coronary sinus flow is represented by the area under the volume flow curve. Note that coronary sinus flow at rest is lower in the volunteer (126 mL/min) than in the patient (173 mL/min), which is related to the smaller LV mass in the volunteer. Normalized LV perfusion per myocardial mass is identical in the volunteer and the patient. After administration of dipyridamole, mean coronary sinus flow increases to 528 mL/min in the volunteer and 545 mL/min in the patient, which represents CFRs of 4.2 and 3.2, respectively.

 


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Graphs depict representative phasic data obtained throughout the cardiac cycle for (a) area of coronary sinus, expressed as the number of pixels measured on magnitude images; (b) velocity of coronary sinus blood flow obtained from phase images; and (c) volume flow calculated as the product of area and velocity. Left graphs represent data from a volunteer, and right graphs depict data from a patient with chronic heart failure. All data are shown at rest ({diamondsuit}) and after infusion of dipyridamole ({circ}). Coronary sinus is depicted with a large number of pixels, which enables close tracing of the vessel throughout the cardiac cycle. Note dilatation of the coronary sinus in the patient. At rest, blood flow velocities show a biphasic pattern, with a first peak during midsystole and a second peak during early diastole. Negative velocities occur at end diastole because of backward flow into the coronary sinus as a result of right atrial contraction. After administration of dipyridamole, the increase in flow velocity is more pronounced in the volunteer, with peak flow velocities at end systole and early diastole. In c, mean coronary sinus flow is represented by the area under the volume flow curve. Note that coronary sinus flow at rest is lower in the volunteer (126 mL/min) than in the patient (173 mL/min), which is related to the smaller LV mass in the volunteer. Normalized LV perfusion per myocardial mass is identical in the volunteer and the patient. After administration of dipyridamole, mean coronary sinus flow increases to 528 mL/min in the volunteer and 545 mL/min in the patient, which represents CFRs of 4.2 and 3.2, respectively.

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3c. Graphs depict representative phasic data obtained throughout the cardiac cycle for (a) area of coronary sinus, expressed as the number of pixels measured on magnitude images; (b) velocity of coronary sinus blood flow obtained from phase images; and (c) volume flow calculated as the product of area and velocity. Left graphs represent data from a volunteer, and right graphs depict data from a patient with chronic heart failure. All data are shown at rest ({diamondsuit}) and after infusion of dipyridamole ({circ}). Coronary sinus is depicted with a large number of pixels, which enables close tracing of the vessel throughout the cardiac cycle. Note dilatation of the coronary sinus in the patient. At rest, blood flow velocities show a biphasic pattern, with a first peak during midsystole and a second peak during early diastole. Negative velocities occur at end diastole because of backward flow into the coronary sinus as a result of right atrial contraction. After administration of dipyridamole, the increase in flow velocity is more pronounced in the volunteer, with peak flow velocities at end systole and early diastole. In c, mean coronary sinus flow is represented by the area under the volume flow curve. Note that coronary sinus flow at rest is lower in the volunteer (126 mL/min) than in the patient (173 mL/min), which is related to the smaller LV mass in the volunteer. Normalized LV perfusion per myocardial mass is identical in the volunteer and the patient. After administration of dipyridamole, mean coronary sinus flow increases to 528 mL/min in the volunteer and 545 mL/min in the patient, which represents CFRs of 4.2 and 3.2, respectively.

 
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as the mean plus or minus SD. The body surface area was calculated by means of a standard formula (14). Because age and body surface area were significantly different between the two groups, and because age and body surface area were often correlated with the dependent variables, their possible confounding effects were controlled for analysis of covariance. Differences within the groups were analyzed by means of the Student t test for paired data. Determinants of LV ejection fraction were analyzed by means of linear regression analysis. A P value of less than .05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
LV Mass, Volumes, and Ejection Fraction
The Table shows the data for LV mass, volumes, and ejection fraction in both groups. The interobserver variability in LV mass measured on cine MR images was 5% ± 8. Patients with chronic heart failure had higher LV mass compared with that in the volunteers. End-systolic volume was significantly larger in patients than that in volunteers. Furthermore, ejection fraction was significantly lower in patients compared with that in volunteers. The end-diastolic volume showed a tendency to be larger in patients.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Comparison of MR Measurements of LV Mass and LV Volume between Groups

 
Hemodynamic Parameters at Rest and after Dipyridamole
At rest, there was no significant difference between volunteers and patients with respect to heart rate (66 beats per minute ± 8 vs 65 beats per minute ± 11, P = .67), diastolic blood pressure (73 mm Hg ± 7 vs 76 mm Hg ± 8, P = .66), or systolic blood pressure (112 mm Hg ± 4 vs 127 mm Hg ± 11, P = .28). The rate-pressure product was similar in the two groups, with 7,413 mm Hg/min ± 853 for volunteers and 8,161 mm Hg/min ± 1,183 for patients (P = .81).

After infusion of dipyridamole, no patients or volunteers experienced any deleterious side effects. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures did not change significantly in either group compared with those at rest. Compared with the rate at rest, the heart rate increased significantly to 98 beats per minute ± 11 in volunteers (P = .001) and to 80 beats per minute ± 11 in patients (P = .001), and the rate-pressure product increased to 11,020 mm Hg/min ± 1,063 in volunteers (P = .001) and to 10,127 mm Hg/min ± 1,818 in patients (P = .001). The rate-pressure product after administration of dipyridamole was not significantly different between the two groups (P = .14).

Coronary Sinus Flow at Rest and after Infusion of Dipyridamole
At rest, LV perfusion was not significantly different between patients with chronic heart failure (0.46 mL/min/g ± 0.19) and volunteers (0.52 mL/min/g ± 0.21) (P = .54). After administration of dipyridamole, LV perfusion was significantly increased to 1.07 mL/min/g ± 0.64 in patients and to 2.19 mL/min/g ± 0.98 in volunteers (P = .01 for both groups vs values at rest) (Fig 4). The increment of LV perfusion after dipyridamole infusion was significantly smaller in patients than that in volunteers (P = .03) (Fig 4). Furthermore, CFR was significantly reduced in patients compared with that in volunteers (2.3 ± 0.9 vs 4.2 ± 1.5, P = .01) (Fig 5). Regression analysis revealed a moderate positive relationship between CFR and LV ejection fraction (Y = 0.84 ± 0.05X, r = 0.54, P = .02, standard error of the estimate = 1.34) (Fig 6). Interobserver variability for measurement of coronary sinus flow was 3% ± 8 at rest and 1% ± 7 after infusion of dipyridamole.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Bar graph depicts LV perfusion per gram of myocardial mass in volunteers and patients with chronic heart failure. At rest (white bars), no differences in LV perfusion were observed between the two groups. After infusion of dipyridamole (black bars), perfusion increased in both groups (P = .01 [*] vs values at rest). However, the increment in LV perfusion was smaller in patients than that in volunteers (P = .03).

 


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. Bar graph depicts CFR in volunteers and in patients with chronic heart failure. Mean CFR was severely reduced in patients compared with that in volunteers (P = .01).

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Graph depicts results of regression analysis, which revealed a significant linear relationship between CFR and ejection fraction (Y = 0.84 + 0.05X, r = 0.54, P = .02, standard error of the estimate = 1.34) with data from volunteers ({diamond}) and patients with chronic heart failure ({diamondsuit}). Note that three of the 10 patients had an ejection fraction greater than 40% at cine MR imaging despite an inclusion criterion of reduced ejection fraction of less than 40%, which was based on echocardiographic measurements at the time of enrollment.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The major findings in the current study are the following: (a) Despite increased LV mass, patients with chronic heart failure had normal LV perfusion at rest compared with that for volunteers. (b) After administration of dipyridamole, LV perfusion was significantly less in patients, which resulted in a substantially reduced CFR compared with that for volunteers. (c) A positive correlation was found between reduced CFR and impairment of ejection fraction. Results in this study show that combined VEC and cine MR imaging enables noninvasive assessment of LV perfusion and function in humans. This imaging strategy may be useful to study the beneficial effects of pharmacologic or interventional therapies for improving myocardial perfusion and performance of LV function in patients with chronic heart failure.

Comparison with Previous Studies
In two previous studies, normal data are reported for LV perfusion in volunteers with VEC MR measurements of coronary sinus flow (10,15). Similar to the current findings, Schwitter et al (10) found LV perfusion in volunteers of 0.53 mL/min/g ± 0.14 at rest, which increased to 2.27 mL/min/g ± 0.78 after infusion of dipyridamole. Kawada et al (15) reported slightly higher values of 0.74 mL/min/g ± 0.23 for LV perfusion in volunteers at rest and 2.14 mL/min/g ± 0.51 after infusion of dipyridamole. The good agreement of perfusion data between the current study and previous studies indicates the robustness of MR imaging for quantifying LV perfusion. Measurements of LV perfusion are slightly lower at MR imaging than those obtained at PET, which ranged between 0.75 and 1.1 mL/min/g at rest in volunteers (16).

Remodeling and LV Perfusion in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
A number of studies were performed to investigate the development of cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction (5,6,17). Most previous MR studies have focused on the effect of medical therapy on remodeling in patients with acute or chronic infarction (18,19). To our knowledge, however, little is known about the effect of LV perfusion on LV remodeling. Findings in an experimental study revealed that the myocardial blood flow is reduced after vasodilation in only those animals with LV remodeling and features of chronic heart failure (20). Interestingly, animals without any features of chronic heart failure had normal LV perfusion at rest and after vasodilation (20). Results of a recent clinical study show a positive relationship between preserved CFR and extent of viable myocardium in patients after acute myocardial infarction (4). It is conceivable that a preserved CFR implies survival of viable myocardium, which in turn mitigates progressive remodeling after myocardial infarction.

Data collected in the current study give further insight into the relationship between LV perfusion and cardiac remodeling in patients with chronic heart failure. Patients in the current study had typical features of remodeling, such as increased LV mass, increased end-systolic volume, and decreased ejection fraction. Despite increased myocardial mass, LV perfusion at rest was normal in patients compared with that in volunteers (Fig 4). However, dipyridamole showed a severely reduced CFR in this group of patients, which suggests a profound perfusion abnormality that is most likely related to multiple stenoses in the coronary arteries. Patients with the most severely depressed CFR had the lowest contractile function (Fig 6). The positive correlation between reduced CFR and impairment of LV function found in the current study emphasizes the negative effect of reduced perfusion on myocardial function.

Contributing Factors for Reduced CFR
Besides stenoses of coronary arteries, there may be several other reasons for reduced CFR in patients with chronic heart failure. First, CFR is reduced in patients with chronic heart failure because of increased LV mass. Findings in a previous study show that patients with LV hypertrophy have a higher level of autoregulated blood flow at rest to meet the demand of the increased myocardial mass (2). Therefore, CFR is reduced in patients with LV hypertrophy because the resting flow is already raised closer to the level of maximal achievable flow (2). Second, recurrent microembolization may be responsible for a reduction in CFR and a decrease in contractile function in patients with coronary artery disease (21,22). Results of a study of patients with coronary artery disease revealed that CFR was persistently reduced despite a successfully performed coronary angioplasty, presumably as a result of microembolization into distal segments of the dilated coronary artery (21). Furthermore, findings in an animal study demonstrate a progressive decline in contractile function after experimentally induced microembolization (22). Third, impaired endothelium-dependent vascular dilatation of the precapillary vessels (23,24) or increased neurohormonal sympathetic activity may contribute to reduced CFR in patients with chronic heart failure (25,26). Fourth, results in one study (27) show that the responsiveness of the coronary vascular bed to a vasodilator is curtailed mainly by capillary resistance, which is regulated by changes in capillary dimensions or by derecruitment of capillary vessels. Capillary resistance is affected whenever there is functional or structural damage to the capillary vessels, such as in myocardial infarction, diabetes, or hypertension (28). Variable hemodynamics did not noticeably influence the difference in CFR because the rate-pressure products were identical for the two groups at rest and during administration of dipyridamole.

Limitations
The MR imaging strategy used in the current study does not provide regional assessment of LV perfusion, but first-pass perfusion MR imaging can be used when regional assessment of myocardial blood flow is crucial. Note that the development and progression of coronary artery disease is not limited to individual arteries but is a global myocardial process. Similarly, cardiac remodeling comprises functional and architectural changes of the entire heart. To study the relationship between remodeling and perfusion of the left ventricle, it was important to quantify global instead of regional myocardial perfusion. Measurement of LV perfusion in patients with chronic heart failure as a result of inferior wall infarction may be difficult with the proposed imaging strategy, because a variable part of the posterior and inferior septal wall drains into the coronary sinus just before it empties into the right atrium (16). This variable fraction of LV perfusion could have been missed because measurements were performed approximately 2 cm before the entrance of the coronary sinus into the right atrium.

Note also that the number of patients in the current study was small, and they had only mild to moderate symptoms of chronic heart failure. Differences between the groups may have been more defined if patients with severe symptoms of chronic heart failure had been included.

The volunteers were substantially younger and had a lower body surface area compared with the patients. Young volunteers were studied to make it less likely that any of these subjects had coronary artery disease. After we controlled for possible confounding effects of age and body surface area by means of analysis of covariance, the differences were still present between groups. However, a better comparison would have been achieved with volunteers with matched ages.

Accurate flow measurements are dependent on precise definition of vessel size. The vessel size was defined by outlining the border of the vein on the magnitude image. The decision to include a pixel was based on the brightness of the pixel, which represents a validated approach to analyze the data (9,10). Reliability of this approach is confirmed with the low interobserver variability.

Clinical Implications and Conclusions
In the current study, we propose a noninvasive approach to simultaneously evaluate LV function and global LV perfusion in patients with chronic heart failure that provides further insight into the development of cardiac remodeling. Serial noninvasive measurements of mass, volume, and function, as well as myocardial perfusion at rest and during hyperemic conditions, should improve knowledge about the progression of LV remodeling. Furthermore, this imaging strategy may be useful for studying the effect of new interventional or pharmacologic therapies designed to improve LV perfusion and to ameliorate cardiac remodeling.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Steven M. Paul, PhD, Principal Statistician at the School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, for his assistance in analyzing the data. We also thank A. Shimakawa for data acquisition.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Abbreviations: CFR = coronary flow reserve, LV = left ventricular, VEC = velocity-encoded cine

Author contributions: Guarantors of integrity of entire study, G.K.L., M.S., M.B., C.B.H.; study concepts, G.K.L., M.B., C.B.H.; study design, G.K.L., M.S., M.B., C.B.H.; literature research, G.K.L., M.S.; clinical studies, G.K.L., N.W., M.Y., G.P.R., P.A.A., D.C.; data acquisition, G.K.L., N.W., M.Y., G.P.R., P.A.A.; data analysis/interpretation, G.K.L., N.W., M.Y., P.A.A.; statistical analysis, G.K.L., N.W.; manuscript preparation, G.K.L., M.S., C.B.H.; manuscript definition of intellectual content, G.K.L., M.S., M.B., C.B.H.; manuscript editing, G.K.L., M.S., C.B.H.; manuscript revision/review and final version approval, all authors.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Klocke FJ. Measurements of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care. Circulation 1987; 76:1183-1189.[Free Full Text]
  2. Hoffman JI. A critical view of coronary reserve. Circulation 1987; 75(suppl):I6-I11.[Medline]
  3. Uren NG, Crake T, Lefroy DC, et al. Reduced coronary vasodilator function in infarcted and normal myocardium after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1994; 331:222-227.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ragosta M, Powers ER, Samady H, et al. Relationship between extent of residual myocardial viability and coronary flow reserve in patients with recent myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2001; 141:456-462.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation 1990; 81:1161-1172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Pfeffer MA. Left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction. Annu Rev Med 1995; 46:455-466.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Hood WB, Jr. Regional venous drainage of the human heart. Br Heart J 1968; 30:105-109.[Free Full Text]
  8. Arheden H, Saeed M, Tornqvist E, et al. Accuracy of segmented MR velocity mapping to measure small vessel pulsatile flow in a phantom simulating cardiac motion. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:722-728.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lund GK, Wendland MF, Shimakawa A, et al. Coronary sinus flow measurement by velocity-encoded cine MR imaging: validation by flow probes in dogs. Radiology 2000; 217:487-493.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schwitter J, DeMarco T, Kneifel S, et al. Magnetic resonance-based assessment of global coronary flow and flow reserve and its relation to left ventricular functional parameters: a comparison with positron emission tomography. Circulation 2000; 101:2696-2702.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Pelc NJ, Herfkens RJ, Shimakawa A, et al. Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1991; 7:229-254.[Medline]
  12. Spraggins TA. Wireless retrospective gating: application to cine cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1990; 8:675-681.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Semelka RC, Tomei E, Wagner S, et al. Normal left ventricular dimensions and function: interstudy reproducibility of measurements with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174:763-768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Dubois D, Dubois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight are known. Arch Int Med 1916; 17:863-871.
  15. Kawada N, Sakuma H, Yamakado T, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: MR measurement of coronary blood flow and vasodilator flow reserve in patients and healthy subjects. Radiology 1999; 211:129-135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hurst JW, Schlant RC, Alexander RW. The heart, arteries, and veins 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, 1994.
  17. Kramer CM, Rogers WJ, Theobald TM, et al. Dissociation between changes in intramyocardial function and left ventricular volumes in the eight weeks after first anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 1625-1632.
  18. Foster RE, Johnson DB, Barilla F, et al. Changes in left ventricular mass and volumes in patients receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy for left ventricular dysfunction after Q-wave myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1998; 136:269-275.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Groenning BA, Nilsson JC, Sondergaard L, et al. Antiremodeling effects on the left ventricle during beta-blockade with metoprolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36:2072-2080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Zhang J, Wilke N, Wang Y, et al. Functional and bioenergetic consequences of postinfarction left ventricular remodeling in a new porcine model: MRI and 31 P-MRS study. Circulation 1996; 94:1089-1100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Herrmann J, Haude M, Lerman A, et al. Abnormal coronary flow velocity reserve after coronary intervention is associated with cardiac marker elevation. Circulation 2001; 103:2339-2345.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Dorge H, Neumann T, Behrends M, et al. Perfusion-contraction mismatch with coronary microvascular obstruction: role of inflammation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2000; 279:H2587-H2592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Sellke FW, Armstrong ML, Harrison DG. Endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation is abnormal in the coronary microcirculation of atherosclerotic primates. Circulation 1990; 81:1586-1593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Wollschlager H, et al. Modulation of coronary vasomotor tone in humans: progressive endothelial dysfunction with different early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 1991; 83:391-401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Karlsberg RP, Cryer PE, Roberts R. Serial plasma catecholamine response early in the course of clinical acute myocardial infarction: relationship to infarct extent and mortality. Am Heart J 1981; 102:24-29.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. McAlpine HM, Morton JJ, Leckie B, et al. Neuroendocrine activation after acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J 1988; 60:117-124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Jayaweera AR, Wei K, Coggins M, Bin JP, Goodman C, Kaul S. Role of capillaries in determining CBF reserve: new insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Am J Physiol 1999; 277:H2363-H2372.[Medline]
  28. Kaul S. The role of capillaries in determining coronary blood flow reserve: implications for stress-induced reversible perfusion defects. J Nucl Cardiol 2001; 8:694-700.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. Beohar, A. K. Erdogan, D. C. Lee, H. N. Sabbah, M. J. Kern, J. Teerlink, R. O. Bonow, and M. Gheorghiade
Acute heart failure syndromes and coronary perfusion.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2008; 52(1): 13 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. W. Losordo, R. A. Schatz, C. J. White, J. E. Udelson, V. Veereshwarayya, M. Durgin, K. K. Poh, R. Weinstein, M. Kearney, M. Chaudhry, et al.
Intramyocardial Transplantation of Autologous CD34+ Stem Cells for Intractable Angina: A Phase I/IIa Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
Circulation, June 26, 2007; 115(25): 3165 - 3172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lund, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lund, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, C. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE