HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Multimedia All Versions of this Article: 2342041680v1 234/2/319    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fincke, E. M. Articles by Dulchavsky, S. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fincke, E. M. Articles by Dulchavsky, S. A.

Evaluation of Shoulder Integrity in Space: First Report of Musculoskeletal US on the International Space Station¹

¹ From the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Tex (E.M.F., G.P.); Texas Diagnostic Imaging, Dallas, Tex (D.L.); Departments of Radiology (M.v.H.) and Surgery (K.M., S.A.D.), Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202; and Wyle Laboratories, Houston, Tex (A.E.S., D.R.H., D.M., S.L.M.). Received September 30, 2004; revision requested October 12; revision received October 14; accepted October 15. Supported by NASA Flight Grant NNJ04HB07A and the National Space Biomedical Research Institute Grant SMS00301. Address correspondence to S.A.D. (e-mail: sdulcha1@hfhs.org).

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Astronaut Training Imaging, Evaluation, and... Findings DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Investigative procedures were approved by Henry Ford Human Investigation Committee and NASA Johnson Space Center Committee for Protection of Human Subjects. Informed consent was obtained. Authors evaluated ability of nonphysician crewmember to obtain diagnostic-quality musculoskeletal ultrasonographic (US) data of the shoulder by following a just-in-time training algorithm and using real-time remote guidance aboard the International Space Station (ISS). ISS Expedition-9 crewmembers attended a 2.5-hour didactic and hands-on US training session 4 months before launch. Aboard the ISS, they completed a 1-hour computer-based Onboard Proficiency Enhancement program 7 days before examination. Crewmembers did not receive specific training in shoulder anatomy or shoulder US techniques. Evaluation of astronaut shoulder integrity was done by using a Human Research Facility US system. Crew used special positioning techniques for subject and operator to facilitate US in microgravity environment. Common anatomic reference points aided initial probe placement. Real-time US video of shoulder was transmitted to remote experienced sonologists in Telescience Center at Johnson Space Center. Probe manipulation and equipment adjustments were guided with verbal commands from remote sonologists to astronaut operators to complete rotator cuff evaluation. Comprehensive US of crewmember’s shoulder included transverse and longitudinal images of biceps and supraspinatus tendons and articular cartilage surface. Total examination time required to guide astronaut operator to acquire necessary images was approximately 15 minutes. Multiple arm and probe positions were used to acquire dynamic video images that were of excellent quality to allow evaluation of shoulder integrity. Postsession download and analysis of high-fidelity US images collected onboard demonstrated additional anatomic detail that could be used to exclude subtle injury. Musculoskeletal US can be performed in space by minimally trained operators by using remote guidance. This technique can be used to evaluate shoulder integrity in symptomatic crewmembers after strenuous extravehicular activities or to monitor microgravity-associated changes in musculoskeletal anatomy. Just-in-time training, combined with remote experienced physician guidance, may provide a useful approach to complex medical tasks performed by nonexperienced personnel in a variety of remote settings, including current and future space programs.

Supplemental material: radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2342041680/DC1

© RSNA, 2004

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Astronaut Training Imaging, Evaluation, and... Findings DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Medical care capabilities for the International Space Station (ISS) and future exploration space missions are currently being defined (1,2). Although rigorous astronaut selection procedures reduce the chance of chronic health problems, acute conditions can occur during spaceflight (3,4). The probability of a crewmember developing a medical condition that may affect their performance or require care may be increased during long-duration or exploration missions.

Some alterations in musculoskeletal integrity take place during prolonged exposure to microgravity, despite the generally successful exercise countermeasures (5). Insidious reduction in bone, muscle, and tendon mass that has been observed during spaceflight may heighten the risk of musculoskeletal injury. In addition, strenuous physical work during spacewalks, combined with upper body and arm motion constrained by the current spacesuits, further raises the likelihood of shoulder injury.

The assessment of musculoskeletal integrity is difficult in space because of limited medical training of the crew and a lack of radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging capabilities on either the transport vehicles or the ISS (6,7). However, a multipurpose diagnostic ultrasonographic (US) system is available within the Human Research Facility (HRF) of the ISS. We evaluated the ability of a nonphysician astronaut operator to perform shoulder US by using remote guidance techniques. This report documents the first shoulder US examination ever performed in microgravity of spaceflight.

	Astronaut Training

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Astronaut Training Imaging, Evaluation, and... Findings DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The ability of two nonphysician astronaut crewmembers to perform shoulder musculoskeletal US was evaluated in the HRF of the ISS during ISS Expedition 9. The investigative procedures were approved by the Henry Ford Human Investigation Committee and the NASA Johnson Space Center Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects. Both crewmembers received briefings and acknowledged their informed consent before the mission, as did other human participants.

Astronaut crewmembers attended a 2.5-hour US familiarization session approximately 4 months before this evaluation to include a brief didactic presentation on the basics of US examination and the experiment-specific principles of remote guidance. The crewmembers also participated in a hands-on US session in the Payload Development Laboratory at the Johnson Space Center, Houston, Tex, where they performed abdominal and musculoskeletal US on a human subject via remote guidance from an experienced sonologist (A.S. and D.L., with 15 and 10 years of experience in musculoskeletal US, respectively). The hands-on sessions were designed to closely simulate in-orbit experiments. Real-time US images were transmitted to the remote sonologist, who guided the astronauts through the necessary positioning, probe placement and manipulation, and equipment adjustments to obtain optimal images. Identical remote-guidance "cue cards" were available to the guiding experienced sonologist on the ground and the operator onboard. The cards included keyboard prompts, anatomic reference points, and other essential information to increase remote guidance efficiency.

	Imaging, Evaluation, and Communication

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Astronaut Training Imaging, Evaluation, and... Findings DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The ground and in-flight US examinations were both performed with flight-modified HDI-5000 US systems (ATL; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, Wash) by using high-frequency (5–12-MHz) linear probes. Images were viewed by the operator on a flat-panel monitor and were transmitted simultaneously to remote US-guidance sonologists (A.S., D.L.) via local circuits (ground familiarization session) or through satellite broadband transmission (flight session). Flight communications include a 1.6-second transmission delay due to distance, data relaying, and conversions. Still and video cameras in the U.S. Laboratory module automatically recorded the US session, but recorded images and video were downloaded to the experiment team only after completion of the experiment.

The astronauts were asked to develop specific restraining techniques for both the subject and the operator, which would allow access to the upper arm and shoulder area, provide stability for the examination, allow unrestricted use of the keyboard, and help avoid operator hand fatigue.

The astronaut US operator completed a 1-hour computer-based US "refresher" course by using the Onboard Proficiency Enhancement (OPE) compact disk developed by the evaluation team 1 week before the US session. Information regarding OPE navigation, time on task, and query responses was stored on the ISS computer and was downlinked to the evaluation team before the US session to allow the team to refine the procedure or highlight certain procedural components to facilitate the upcoming US evaluations.

The US session was completed during scheduled Ku-band (video) and S-band (voice) communications. Dynamic US video was routed through the ISS communications system to the Telescience Center at the Johnson Space Center, where the ground-based experienced sonologist viewed the video output from the US machine with near real-time (1.6-second delay) conditions. Two-way audio communication with the US operator was used to guide US probe placement and adjust US device settings.

A full unilateral shoulder musculoskeletal examination was conducted, which included transverse and longitudinal views of the biceps and supraspinatus tendons and the articular cartilage surface. The examination was initiated with the probe positioned at the distal end of the clavicle in a longitudinal attitude. The probe was "steered" with remote experienced sonologist voice commands to achieve the desired images. After acquisition of the four views of the shoulder area, the subject and operator aboard the ISS switched roles, and the examination was repeated.

Examination completeness was evaluated initially by the ground-based experienced musculoskeletal sonologist by viewing the real-time downlinked US video stream. Full-resolution US frames were saved during the examination and were downlinked to the Telescience Center at a later time. These images were subsequently reviewed by an outside musculoskeletal US specialist (M.v.H.) to verify the diagnostic quality of the examination and the ability to exclude injury on the resultant images.

	Findings

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Astronaut Training Imaging, Evaluation, and... Findings DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The astronaut crewmembers used foot restraints and hand pressure to maintain positioning and freedom of movement in the microgravity environment (Fig 1). This positioning technique allowed the subject to help with keyboard adjustments and provided rapid switching of the subject and operator when the examination was complete (Movie 1, radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2342041680/DC1). No hand fatigue was reported, which had been noted by previous crewmembers who performed abdominal, cardiac, and thoracic US on the ISS, most likely as a result of the additional effort required when restraint is not optimal.

View larger version (156K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 1. Cabin view obtained with a still camera of the HRF on the ISS. Commander Gennady Palalka performs a musculoskeletal US examination on Mike Fincke by using an HRF US unit (blue flat-screen monitor and keyboard).

View larger version (161K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 2. Full-resolution US images of the shoulder were downlinked from the ISS to mission control after the US examination. This image demonstrates a longitudinal view of the biceps tendon. The proximal intracapsular end of the long biceps tendon (T) is displayed on the observer’s left. Within the normal tendon, a distinct fibrillar pattern is noted (arrow). D = deltoid muscle.

View larger version (156K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 3. On this transverse view of the extracapsular biceps, the echogenic round shape of the tendon (arrow) is recognized between the lesser tuberosity () and the greater tuberosity (G). D = deltoid muscle.

View larger version (150K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 4. With the transducer placed over the long axis of the deltoid muscle (D), note the longitudinal striations (upper arrows) of the fibrofatty septa in between the muscle bundles. Supraspinatus tendon (S) is displayed in its long axis deep to the deltoid. The tendon rests on the bright echogenic surface of the proximal humerus. The humeral head shows on the medial aspect (observer’s right) and the greater tuberosity more laterally. The anatomic neck is recognized on the groove (lower arrow) between these bone surfaces.

View larger version (151K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 5. With the transducer turned perpendicular to the position in Figure 4, the examination of the supraspinatus (S) is completed with transverse views of the cuff. The deltoid muscle (D) is separated from the supraspinatus by alternating hypo- and hyperechoic lines, representing bursa and peribursal fat. The echogenic supraspinatus rests on hypoechoic hyaline cartilage over the echogenic humeral head surface (c).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Astronaut Training Imaging, Evaluation, and... Findings DISCUSSION REFERENCES

US is currently used in many trauma centers to diagnose abdominal injury (8,9). The technique has been shown to be accurate and sensitive in the identification of intraabdominal hemorrhage, even when performed by nonradiologists or nonphysicians (10). NASA investigators have similarly demonstrated that US can be used by nonphysicians to diagnose thoracic injury or bone fracture. The performance of US examinations and interpretation of images for the detection of abdominal bleeding or long-bone fracture do not require extensive training. Conversely, musculoskeletal US is substantially more complex and requires specialized expertise during both data acquisition and image interpretation.

Basic ultrasonic imaging has been completed on both U.S. and Russian spacecraft (5,11,12). NASA investigators have demonstrated a wide array of diagnostic US applications in microgravity experiments on animal models and human volunteers during parabolic flight on KC-135 aircraft. Results of these investigations suggest that the sensitivity and specificity of these US applications are not degraded in microgravity and may even be enhanced in certain circumstances. More comprehensive US examinations (eg, abdominal, musculoskeletal, and cardiac) require considerably more operator experience to perform and interpret autonomously. Since extensive US training with frequent refresher practice is not feasible in many situations, including remote medicine or the space program, alternative paradigms of US examination are required for this application.

Remote US guidance by experienced sonologists virtually couples a modestly trained US operator with a remote sonologist. The US operator is trained in basic US operation and gross requirements of the US examination. The operator places the US probe in a predetermined and familiar starting point (aided by topologic reference cue cards), and the video stream from the US device is split between the on-site monitor and a remote location, where it is viewed by the experienced sonologist. Optimal probe position and device settings are guided with voice commands from the remote sonologist to obtain the necessary US images.

The remote guidance paradigm substantially reduces initial and refresher operator training requirements and allows experienced sonologist input during the conduct of the examination. We combined remote guidance with a focused review of complex US to complete the shoulder musculoskeletal examinations. The unique software used for OPE evaluation in this project streamlined equipment setup and subject and operator positioning and facilitated the successful completion of the complex US tasks by means of remote guidance. This "just-in-time" training approach allowed preflight and in-flight training time to be reduced substantially. The OPE program was constructed in modules that allow future HRF refinements or equipment alterations to be modified electronically as required. The program also can be used as a framework for other complex tasks that require focused skills or complex instructions. The self-reporting feature of the program allowed the experienced sonologists on the ground to assess operator familiarity with the procedures to better prepare for and conduct the session.

The evaluation of shoulder integrity with the use of US is the standard of care at many institutions and is used by professional athletic teams to evaluate injuries to athletes. Astronaut crewmembers may be at risk of shoulder injury during long-duration spaceflight because of decreases in muscle and tendon mass and exertion during space walks. The extravehicular activity suits that are worn constrain upper body and arm movement. Construction requirements on the ISS and future exploratory missions involving extravehicular activities can increase strain on the shoulder joint. A reliable method for evaluation of shoulder integrity during long-duration space missions would increase medical care capabilities for this operationally relevant concern.

Shoulder musculoskeletal US was performed rapidly and accurately by the two astronaut crewmembers aboard the ISS. The average time to perform the examination was less than 15 minutes. The conduct of the examination was not appreciably different than similar examinations in a terrestrial environment and was aided by innovative restraint techniques developed by the crewmembers (Movie 4, radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2342041680/DC1). The quality of the near real-time US video transmitted to the Telescience Center was very good and could be used to exclude substantial shoulder musculoskeletal injury. Still US images were obtained during the examination and were downlinked to the team afterward. These high-fidelity images were of excellent diagnostic quality and could be used to exclude subtle changes in shoulder integrity.

The ability of the ISS crew to perform complex US tasks aboard the ISS supports the hypothesis that a nonphysician crewmember with modest training in US can perform high-fidelity diagnostic-quality examinations when directed by a ground-based experienced sonologist. The images acquired by the astronaut in this study were of excellent content and quality, and in a "real" medical scenario, they would have provided essential information to guide clinical decision making. There were no discernible differences between the US examinations performed in orbit and those performed in standard terrestrial conditions when the images were evaluated by the experienced sonologists involved in this trial.

The optimal training of crewmembers for the ISS and later exploration-class missions is still being defined. This initial US experience suggests that limited training, combined with onboard proficiency enhancement and directed remote guidance, may be an effective technique for performing complex tasks. The examination was conducted within a strictly limited time frame, which would probably be the case in most terrestrial situations, such as in some remote and most military settings.

The unique constraints imposed by the space environment require the development of detailed training, diagnostic, and therapeutic strategies. Although some of the aerospace procedures currently investigated by NASA are appropriate only for the space environment, many other spaceflight-derived techniques are readily transferable to the Earth, including rural, military, and emergency medical care. The remotely guided US concept, with crew medical officers or comparably trained first responders as operators, is an important and clinically relevant advancement in space medicine, with profound ramifications for emergency or clinical medicine (Audio 1, radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/2342041680/DC1).

	FOOTNOTES

 
Abbreviations: HRF = Human Research Facility, ISS = International Space Station, OPE = Onboard Proficiency Enhancement

Author contributions: Guarantor of integrity of entire study, S.A.D.; study concepts and design, all authors; literature research, S.A.D. M.v.H.; data acquisition and analysis/interpretation, all authors; manuscript preparation and definition of intellectual content, all authors; manuscript editing, S.A.D., K.M.; manuscript revision/review and manuscript final version approval, all authors

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Astronaut Training Imaging, Evaluation, and... Findings DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1. Davis JR. Medical issues for a mission to Mars. Aviat Space Environ Med 1999; 70:162-168.[Medline]
2. Grigoriev AI, Egorov AD. The theory and practice of medical support of long-term space missions. Aviakosm Ekolog Med 1997; 31:14-25. [Russian].[Medline]
3. NASA. Medical intervention and care. ISS Medical Operations Requirements Document SSP 50260, clause 4.1. Rev B ed Houston, Tex: NASA, 2003.
4. Grigoriev AI, Bugrov SA, Bogomolov VV, et al. Medical results of the Mir year-long mission. Physiologist 1991; 34(suppl 1):S44-S48.[Medline]
5. Gazenko OG, Shul’zhenko EB, Grigor’ev AI, At’kov OI. Medical studies during an 8-month flight on the orbital complex "Saliut-7"—"Soiuz-T". Kosm Biol Aviakosm Med 1990; 24:9-14. [Russian].
6. Harris BA, Jr, Billica RD, Bishop SL, et al. Physical examination during space flight. Mayo Clin Proc 1997; 72:301-308.[Medline]
7. Sargsyan A. Medical imaging In: Barratt MR, Pool SL, eds. Principles of clinical medicine for space flight. New York, NY: Springer Verlag, 2003.
8. Patel JC, Tepas JJ, 3rd. The efficacy of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) as a screening tool in the assessment of injured children. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34:44-47; discussion, 52–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Scalea TM, Rodriguez A, Chiu WC, et al. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST): results from an international consensus conference. J Trauma 1999; 46:466-472.[Medline]
10. Boulanger BR, Kearney PA, Brenneman FD, Tsuei B, Ochoa J. Utilization of FAST (Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma) in 1999: results of a survey of North American trauma centers. Am Surg 2000; 66:1049-1055.[Medline]
11. Atkov OY. Ultrasound techniques in space medicine. Aviat Space Environ Med 1987; 58(9 pt 2):A69-A73.[Medline]
12. Jadvar H. Medical imaging in microgravity. Aviat Space Environ Med 2000; 71:640-646.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Cole Sonography's Expansion Into Space Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, November 1, 2008; 24(6): 380 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Rao, L. van Holsbeeck, J. L. Musial, A. Parker, J. A. Bouffard, P. Bridge, M. Jackson, and S. A. Dulchavsky A Pilot Study of Comprehensive Ultrasound Education at the Wayne State University School of Medicine: A Pioneer Year Review J. Ultrasound Med., May 1, 2008; 27(5): 745 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Thrall Teleradiology * Part I. History and Clinical Applications Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 613 - 617. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Popov, D. Popov, I. Kacar, and R. D. Harris The Feasibility of Real-Time Transmission of Sonographic Images from a Remote Location over Low-Bandwidth Internet Links: A Pilot Study Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): W219 - W222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Finn, R. Saleh, S. Thesen, S. G. Ruehm, M. H. Lee, J. Grinstead, J. S. Child, and G. Laub MR Imaging with Remote Control: Feasibility Study in Cardiovascular Disease Radiology, November 1, 2006; 241(2): 528 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Wolbarst and W. R. Hendee Evolving and Experimental Technologies in Medical Imaging Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 16 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Multimedia All Versions of this Article: 2342041680v1 234/2/319    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fincke, E. M. Articles by Dulchavsky, S. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Fincke, E. M. Articles by Dulchavsky, S. A.