<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org">
<title>Radiology Evidence-based Radiology Series</title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org</link>
<description>Radiology RSS feed -- recent Evidence-based Radiology Series articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-1315</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Radiology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0033-8419</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/244/3/643?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Radiology</title>
<url>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/244/3/643?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Evidence-based Radiology Series] The Practice of Ethics in the Era of Evidence-based Radiology]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/244/3/643?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>Various methods to provide an ethical conscience in the modern practice of radiology are available, but they all require time and effort. Although this is part of a series dedicated to evidence-based radiology (EBR), this article cannot provide recommendations supported by evidence. However, the method we propose is inspired from the analytic process found in EBR. It emphasizes autonomous reflection; systematic identification of roles, motives, and consequences of current actions and organizations; clarification of aims and means; selection of principles and values; and equilibration, application, and validation. This personal process is followed by the search for common values shared by the group, in a rational, scientific context centered on preserving the patient-physician relationship. This method entails constant vigilance and repeated revisions, but the allowance of time to think about ethical matters can decrease confusion and moral perplexity. The result is a stronger moral personal identity and a brighter horizon for a satisfying professional life.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2007</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raymond, J., Trop, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-08-20</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2443052026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Evidence-based Radiology Series] The Practice of Ethics in the Era of Evidence-based Radiology]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>244</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>649</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2007-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>643</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Evidence-based Radiology Series</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>