<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org">
<title>Radiology Vascular and Interventional Radiology</title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org</link>
<description>Radiology RSS feed -- recent Vascular and Interventional Radiology articles</description>
<prism:eIssn>1527-1315</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Radiology</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0033-8419</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1050?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1056?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1067?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/670?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/680?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/288?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/297?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/303?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/871?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/880?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/887?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/896?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Radiology</title>
<url>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1050?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Increasing Carotid Plaque Echolucency is Predictive of Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Patients]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1050?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> Carotid plaque echolucency seen at ultrasonography (US) is a potential indicator of plaque instability and may help identify patients at risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The authors performed this study to determine whether decreasing gray-scale median (GSM) levels at repeat carotid US examinations are associated with future MACEs.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee and all patients provided informed consent. The authors prospectively studied 574 patients with carotid plaques of at least 30% from a group of 1268 consecutive patients who were initially asymptomatic with respect to carotid disease. GSM levels were determined with carotid US at baseline and after a median of 7.5 months (range, 6&ndash;9 months), and the mean change of the GSM was calculated. Patients were then followed up clinically for a median of 3.2 years for the occurrence of composite MACE.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> During the initial period, the median change in carotid GSM was 2.9 (interquartile range [IQR], &ndash;6.9 to 11.0). Of 574 study participants, 230 (40%) showed a reduction of GSM levels and 344 (60%) showed an increase. MACEs were observed in 177 (31%) of the 574 patients. Adjusted hazard ratios for the lowest quartile (GSM change less than &ndash;6.9), the second quartile (GSM change between &ndash;6.9 and 2.9), and the third quartile (GSM change between 3.0 and 11.0) were 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09, 2.66), 1.36 (95% CI: 0.86, 2.16), and 1.22 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.95), respectively, compared with the highest quartile (GSM change greater than 11.0) (<I>P</I> = .018).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Increasing echolucency of carotid artery plaques within a 6- to 9-month interval is predictive of midterm clinical adverse events of atherosclerosis.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reiter, M., Effenberger, I., Sabeti, S., Mlekusch, W., Schlager, O., Dick, P., Puchner, S., Amighi, J., Bucek, R. A., Minar, E., Schillinger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2483071817</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Increasing Carotid Plaque Echolucency is Predictive of Cardiovascular Events in High-Risk Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1055</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1050</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1056?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Hepatic Malignancies: Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation during Percutaneous Portal or Hepatic Vein Occlusion]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1056?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively evaluate the technical feasibility, effectiveness, and complications of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for hepatic malignancies during temporary percutaneous balloon occlusion (PBO) of a large hepatic or portal vein.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> During a 4-year period, RF ablation was performed in 201 patients (106 men, 95 women; age range, 41&ndash;88 years) with 233 liver tumors. Institutional review board approval was obtained to attempt RF ablation during PBO for 18 tumors that were larger than 35 mm (mean, 43 mm &plusmn; 7.6 [standard deviation]; range, 36&ndash;60 mm) and did not abut a portal or hepatic vein 4 mm in diameter or larger (group 1), 58 tumors 35 mm or smaller (mean, 23 mm &plusmn; 7.3; range, 12&ndash;35 mm) that abutted a large vessel (group 2), and 20 tumors that were both larger than 35 mm (mean, 42 mm &plusmn; 5.7; range, 38&ndash;50 mm) and abutted a large vessel (group 3). RF ablation without PBO was performed for 137 tumors 35 mm or smaller (mean, 22 mm &plusmn; 6.8; range, 9&ndash;35 mm) and remote from large vessels (group 4). Rate of local tumor progression was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and tumor progression&ndash;free rates were compared between the four groups with the log-rank test. Complications were compared by using the Fisher exact test between the four groups and between the two RF devices used.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> PBO was achieved in 94 of 96 attempts (98%), including 64 of 64 hepatic veins and 30 of 32 portal branches. After a mean follow-up of 18 months &plusmn; 9, 10 tumors in eight patients were lost to follow-up. Local tumor progression was observed in six (40%) of 15 tumors in group 1, in six (11%) of 56 tumors in group 2, in eight (40%) of 20 tumors in group 3, and in 12 (9%) of 130 tumors in group 4. Combined analysis of tumor size and the use of PBO showed that size was the only prognostic factor for tumor progression, with a hazard ratio of 4.9 (95% confidence interval: 2.4, 9.9) (<I>P</I> &lt; .001). There were no differences between groups 2 and 4. Asymptomatic, transient postprocedure venous thrombosis was seen in nine of 94 RF ablations with PBO, while occlusion of one permanent portal branch induced segmental liver atrophy. There were no differences in rates of complications (5% and 6% for RF ablation with and that without PBO, respectively).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> RF ablation with PBO provides tumor control for tumors smaller than 35 mm in diameter that abut vessels 4 mm or larger, equivalent to tumor control of the same-size tumors away from vessels. PBO does not seem to affect the results of RF ablation for tumors 35 mm or larger.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[de Baere, T., Deschamps, F., Briggs, P., Dromain, C., Boige, V., Hechelhammer, L., Abdel-Rehim, M., Auperin, A., Goere, D., Elias, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2483070222</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Hepatic Malignancies: Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation during Percutaneous Portal or Hepatic Vein Occlusion]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1066</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1056</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1067?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Visceral and Soft-Tissue Tumors: Radiofrequency and Alcohol Ablation for Pain Relief--Initial Experience]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/3/1067?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To determine retrospectively the effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) alone, alcohol ablation alone, or combined RFA and alcohol ablation (hereafter, combined ablation) to treat pain in patients with visceral and soft-tissue malignancies.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This HIPAA-compliant study was institutional review board approved; the informed consent requirement was waived. Twenty patients, with 28 tumors, who underwent percutaneous computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR)-guided RFA and/or alcohol ablation for pain relief over a 2-year period were retrospectively identified, and their medical and imaging data were studied: Nineteen patients were referred for ablation because of persistent pain despite use of analgesics, and one patient had refused analgesics. The 28 tumors were located in the liver, lung, adrenal gland, retroperitoneum, gluteal muscle, inguinal mass, and subcutaneous tissues on the back. Fifteen tumors were treated with RFA alone, 12 were treated with combined ablation (when lesions were &gt; 4 cm in diameter, except in lung or renal tumors), and one was treated with alcohol ablation alone. Pain was quantified on a 0&ndash;10 scale before, 1 day after, and 1&ndash;6 weeks after ablation. On the basis of changes in pain score and pain medication use, pain was reported with a composite measure as complete, partial, or no pain response. Quantitative pain scale values were compared by using Friedman and Tukey post hoc tests to assess significant changes.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> At 1&ndash;6-week follow-up, pain relief was complete in nine patients (45%) and partial in six (30%); pain relief did not occur in five patients (25%). There was a significant (<I>P</I> &lt; .05) decrease in pain at 1-day and 1&ndash;6-week follow-up compared with pain at baseline. Three adverse events were caused by therapy: Two were major complications (femoral neuropathy in one patient, perinephric hematoma and hemobilia in one patient), and one was a side effect of ablation (right shoulder pain) that resolved spontaneously.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Percutaneous RFA alone or in combination with alcohol ablation provided pain relief from visceral tumors in most patients with intractable pain.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nair, R. T., vanSonnenberg, E., Shankar, S., Morrison, P. R., Gill, R. R., Tuncali, K., Silverman, S. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2483061883</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Visceral and Soft-Tissue Tumors: Radiofrequency and Alcohol Ablation for Pain Relief--Initial Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1076</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1067</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/670?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Subcapsular Liver Tumors Treated with Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: A Prospective Comparison with Nonsubcapsular Liver Tumors for Safety and Effectiveness]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/670?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To assess the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of subcapsular liver tumors.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board, and all patients gave written informed consent. One hundred eighty-one patients (79 men, 102 women; age range, 36&ndash;85 years) underwent ultrasonographically (US) guided percutaneous RF ablation of 361 primary or secondary (metastatic) liver tumors. Forty-four patients had one or more subcapsular nodules (group 1), and 137 had nonsubcapsular nodules only (group 2). Overall, 80 nodules were subcapsular and 281 were nonsubcapsular. The completeness of the ablation was assessed with contrast material&ndash;enhanced computed tomography (CT) 1 month after RF ablation. If residual tumor was documented, RF ablation was repeated. All patients in whom the ablation was complete after the first or second ablation session were monitored with CT or contrast-enhanced US every 3 months. Major complication, complete ablation, and local tumor progression rates were compared by using the <SUP>2</SUP> test or Fisher exact test.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Three (7%) major complications (intraperitoneal bleeding, skin burn, and tumor seeding) occurred in group 1, and two (1.5%) cases of tumor seeding occurred in group 2 (<I>P</I> = .093). No RF ablation&ndash;related deaths occurred. The complete ablation rate was 98% (43 of 44 patients) in group 1 and 98.5% (135 of 137 patients) in group 2 (<I>P</I> = .756). The local tumor progression rate after a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 13&ndash;54 months) was 16% (seven of 43 patients) in group 1 and 9.6% (13 of 135 patients) in group 2 (<I>P</I> = .355).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> The difference in major complication rate between the subcapsular and nonsubcapsular liver tumors was not significant. The safety of RF ablation of subcapsular tumors seems acceptable, and the effectiveness is comparable to that of RF ablation of nonsubcapsular tumors.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sartori, S., Tombesi, P., Macario, F., Nielsen, I., Tassinari, D., Catellani, M., Abbasciano, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071690</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Subcapsular Liver Tumors Treated with Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: A Prospective Comparison with Nonsubcapsular Liver Tumors for Safety and Effectiveness]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>679</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>670</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/680?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] High-Spatial-Resolution Lower Extremity MR Angiography at 3.0 T: Contrast Agent Dose Comparison Study]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/2/680?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To determine whether contrast material dose reduction at 3.0 T allows preserved image quality for high-spatial-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the lower extremities.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Forty-five consecutive patients (27 men, 18 women; mean age, 64 years) underwent contrast material&ndash;enhanced MR angiography of the lower extremities at 3.0 T. A waiver of informed consent was granted by the institutional review board. Sixteen patients received high-dose (approximately 0.3 mmol/kg), 15 received intermediate-dose (approximately 0.2 mmol/kg), and 14 received low-dose (approximately 0.1 mmol/kg) gadopentetate dimeglumine during a three-station, dual-injection examination. For scoring purposes, the arterial system from the celiac trunk to the plantar arteries was divided into 34 segments. The images were retrospectively and independently evaluated by two specialized radiologists who were blinded to the patient dose groups. All studies were assessed for overall image quality and the degree of contaminating venous enhancement. Each arterial segment was scored for the quality of vessel definition, the severity of stenoses, and the presence of collateral vessels.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> More than 99% of arterial segments were found to be of diagnostic image quality by both readers in all dose groups. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed a significant difference among the three groups with regard to vessel definition (<I>P</I> = .019). No significant difference was found between the high- and intermediate-dose groups; however, the low-dose group had significantly better vessel definition compared with the high-dose (<I>P</I> = .034) and intermediate-dose (<I>P</I> = .015) groups. There was no significant difference among the groups in visualization of collateral vessels. Venous contamination was seen less frequently in the low-dose group, but the difference did not achieve significance.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> The study showed that, compared with widely used dose strategies at 1.5 T, the contrast agent dose for 3.0-T lower extremity MR angiography can be reduced multifold without compromising image quality.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Habibi, R., Krishnam, M. S., Lohan, D. G., Barkhordarian, F., Jalili, M., Saleh, R. S., Ruehm, S. G., Finn, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-18</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2482071505</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] High-Spatial-Resolution Lower Extremity MR Angiography at 3.0 T: Contrast Agent Dose Comparison Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>692</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>680</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/288?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Large (>=5.0-cm) HCCs: Multipolar RF Ablation with Three Internally Cooled Bipolar Electrodes--Initial Experience in 26 Patients]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/288?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively evaluate the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous multipolar radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of large (&ge;5.0 cm in diameter) hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). </P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Twenty-six patients (four women, 22 men; median age, 72 years) with cirrhosis (Child-Pugh class A disease, 22 patients; Child-Pugh class B disease, four patients) and at least one 5.0&ndash;9.0-cm-diameter HCC without invasion of the portal trunk or main portal branches were treated with multipolar RF ablation performed by a single operator. The procedure was performed with three separate bipolar linear internally cooled electrodes with ultrasonographic guidance. Twenty-seven of the 33 tumors treated had a diameter of 5.0 cm or greater (median diameter, 5.7 cm; range, 5.0&ndash;8.5 cm); 12 of these 27 tumors were infiltrative, and four invaded segmental portal vein branches. Ten patients had a serum -fetoprotein level higher than 400 &micro;g/L. Results were assessed by using computed tomography. Primary effectiveness, complications, tumor progression, and survival rates were recorded. Probabilities of survival were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> One to two RF ablation procedures per patient (mean, 1.15 &plusmn; 0.43 [standard deviation]) led to the complete ablation of 22 (81%) of the 27 tumors (18 tumors after one and four tumors after two procedures), including three tumors that showed segmental portal vein invasion. All patients experienced postablation syndrome, and one experienced subcapsular hematoma and a segmental liver infarct, but no major complication occurred. After a mean follow-up of 14 months (range, 3&ndash;34 months), local and distant tumor progression and actual survival rates were 14% (three of 22), 24% (five of 21), and 65% (17 of 26), respectively. The probabilities of 1- and 2-year survival, respectively, were 68% (95% confidence interval: 49%, 86%) and 56% (95% confidence interval: 51%, 81%).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> HCCs larger than 5.0 cm (but smaller than 9.0 cm)&mdash;even those that are infiltrative and those that involve a segmental portal vein&mdash;can be completely and safely ablated with multipolar RF ablation.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seror, O., N'Kontchou, G., Ibraheem, M., Ajavon, Y., Barrucand, C., Ganne, N., Coderc, E., Claude Trinchet, J., Beaugrand, M., Sellier, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2481071101</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Large (>=5.0-cm) HCCs: Multipolar RF Ablation with Three Internally Cooled Bipolar Electrodes--Initial Experience in 26 Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>296</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>288</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/297?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Conventional Balloon Angioplasty versus Peripheral Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis: Initial Experience]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/297?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To prospectively determine whether cutting balloon angioplasty, when compared with conventional balloon angioplasty (CBA), improves morphologic and clinical outcome in patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> Patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis were randomly assigned to undergo CBA or peripheral cutting balloon angioplasty (PCBA) for treatment of lesions up to 20 cm in length. Patients were followed up clinically and with duplex ultrasonography (US) at 1, 3, and 6 months for occurrence of a restenosis of 50% or higher. The Fisher exact test and Mann Whitney <I>U</I> test were used for statistical analyses.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Forty patients were enrolled; one patient was lost to follow-up. In the remaining patients, CBA was performed in 22 patients; PCBA was used in 17 patients. Average lesion length was 80 mm &plusmn; 68 (standard deviation). Restenosis rates at 6 months were 65% (11 of 17; 95% confidence interval: 42%, 88%) after PCBA versus 73% (16 of 22; 95% confidence interval: 54%, 92%) after CBA (<I>P</I> = .73). Ankle brachial index (0.83 vs 0.75, <I>P</I> = .26) and maximum walking capacity on the treadmill (117 m vs 103 m, <I>P</I> = .97) at 6 months were also not significantly different between the two groups.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> PCBA failed to prove superiority compared with CBA for treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis in this pilot study. In restenotic lesions with an average length of approximately 8 cm, both treatment modalities yielded disappointing 6-month patency rates.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick, P., Sabeti, S., Mlekusch, W., Schlager, O., Amighi, J., Haumer, M., Cejna, M., Minar, E., Schillinger, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2481071159</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Conventional Balloon Angioplasty versus Peripheral Cutting Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of Femoropopliteal Artery In-Stent Restenosis: Initial Experience]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>302</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>297</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/303?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Biochemical and Hematologic Alterations Following Percutaneous Cryoablation of Liver Tumors: Experience in 48 Procedures]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/248/1/303?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively determine the frequency and severity of various abnormal laboratory test values following percutaneous cryoablation of liver tumors and to estimate the correlation between laboratory test values and tumor and ablation volumes.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval. Informed consent was waived. Biochemical and hematologic laboratory values from 48 procedures in 39 patients (18 men and 21 women; age range, 29&ndash;86 years) who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging&ndash;guided percutaneous cryoablation of 65 liver tumors (62 metastases, three hepatocellular carcinomas) were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in laboratory values at baseline and 0&ndash;6 hours and 1&ndash;2 weeks after the procedure were analyzed with respect to tumor and ablative margin volumes by using generalized estimating equations. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were correlated with percent maximal decrease in platelet count.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Mean ablation zone volume was 67.3 cm<SUP>3</SUP> &plusmn; 41.2 (standard deviation) (range, 7.3&ndash;191.4 cm<SUP>3</SUP>). AST and ALT values increased after all procedures and peaked at 6 hours (median change in AST value, +835 U/L; median change in ALT value, +614.5 U/L). Platelet count decreased after 47 procedures (mean maximal decrease, 92.3 <FONT FACE="arial,helvetica">x</FONT> 10<SUP>9</SUP>/L [38%]), reaching a nadir at 12&ndash;24 hours after 24 procedures (50%) and returning to normal in 31 (84%) of 37 procedures at 1&ndash;2 weeks. One procedure was complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation that necessitated transfusion and arterial embolization. Myoglobin values increased after 21 (44%) of 48 procedures and peaked at 6 hours (trimmed-mean value, 183.4 &micro;g/L). Ablative margin volumes were predictive of changes at 0&ndash;6 hours in AST (<I>P</I> = .02), ALT (<I>P</I> = .003), and myoglobin (<I>P</I> &lt; .001) values. Percent maximal decrease in platelet count correlated with peak change in AST (<I>r</I> = 0.72) (<I>P</I> &lt; .001).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Following percutaneous cryoablation of liver tumors, alterations in liver enzymes, myoglobin, and platelet count are common, are usually self-limited, and correlate with ablative margin volume&mdash;except for changes in platelet count, which correlate with changes in AST and ALT.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nair, R. T., Silverman, S. G., Tuncali, K., Obuchowski, N. A., vanSonnenberg, E., Shankar, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2481061874</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Biochemical and Hematologic Alterations Following Percutaneous Cryoablation of Liver Tumors: Experience in 48 Procedures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>1</prism:number>
<prism:volume>248</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>311</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>303</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/871?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Microwave Ablation of Lung Malignancies: Effectiveness, CT Findings, and Safety in 50 Patients]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/871?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively evaluate effectiveness, follow-up imaging features, and safety of microwave ablation in 50 patients with intraparenchymal pulmonary malignancies.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was waived. From November 10, 2003, to August 28, 2006, 82 masses (mean, 1.42 per patient) in 50 patients (28 men, 22 women; mean age, 70 years) were percutaneously treated in 66 microwave ablation sessions. Each tumor was ablated with computed tomographic (CT) guidance. Follow-up contrast material&ndash;enhanced CT and positron emission tomographic (PET) scans were reviewed. Mixed linear modeling and logistic regression were performed. Time-event data were analyzed (Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and log-rank statistic). All event times were the time to a patient's first event ( level = .05, all analyses).</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> At follow-up (mean, 10 months), 26% (13 of 50) of patients had residual disease at the ablation site, predicted by using index size of larger than 3 cm (<I>P</I> = .01). Another 22% (11 of 50) of patients had recurrent disease resulting in a 1-year local control rate of 67%, with mean time to first recurrence of 16.2 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis yielded an actuarial survival of 65% at 1 year, 55% at 2 years, and 45% at 3 years from ablation. Cancer-specific mortality yielded a 1-year survival of 83%, a 2-year survival of 73%, and a 3-year survival of 61%; these values were not significantly affected by index size of larger than 3 cm or 3 cm or smaller or presence of residual disease. Cavitation (43% [35 of 82] of treated tumors) was associated with reduced cancer-specific mortality (<I>P</I> = .02). Immediate complications included pneumothorax (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] grades 1 [18 of 66 patients] and 2 [eight of 66 patients]), hemoptysis (four of 66 patients), and skin burns (CTCAE grades 2 [one of 66 patients] and 3 [one of 66 patients]).</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> Microwave ablation is effective and may be safely applied to lung tumors.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolf, F. J., Grand, D. J., Machan, J. T., DiPetrillo, T. A., Mayo-Smith, W. W., Dupuy, D. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2473070996</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Microwave Ablation of Lung Malignancies: Effectiveness, CT Findings, and Safety in 50 Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>247</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>879</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>871</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/880?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Hepatic Arterial Injuries after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions in the Era of Laparoscopic Surgery and Liver Transplantation: Experience with 930 Patients]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/880?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively determine if patients with a history of intraoperative bile duct injury or liver transplantation have an increased risk for arterial injury (AI) during percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) compared with the risk of AI established in the 1970s and 1980s.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This study was approved by the committee on human research and was deemed compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The informed consent requirement was waived. Records of 1394 procedures (307 PTCs, 1087 PTBDs) performed in 930 patients (445 male, 485 female; age range, 4 months to 99 years) over the past 13 years were retrospectively reviewed. The rate of AI was determined, and demographic, pathologic, technical, and laboratory variables were tested for association with increased risk of AI by using generalized estimating equation analysis.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> AIs were encountered after 30 (2.2%) biliary procedures. No significant difference in the rate of AI was seen among the groups of patients with malignant biliary obstruction (1.8%), history of bile duct injury (2.2%), or complications of liver transplantation (2.6%). Patients who underwent PTBD had a higher risk of AI than did patients who underwent PTC (2.6% vs 0.7%); however, this difference was not significant (<I>P</I> = .06). Ongoing hemobilia was seen in 26 (87%) of the patients, which made it the most common sign of AI, and it had a 94% positive predictive value for AI. A postprocedure decrease in the hematocrit level of more than 13% was seen only in the setting of AI, and it occurred in only three (10%) of patients with AIs.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> PTC and PTBD performed for management of bile duct injury and complications of liver transplantation are not associated with an increased risk of hepatic AIs compared with the risk of AI reported in the 1970s and 1980s.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fidelman, N., Bloom, A. I., Kerlan, R. K., LaBerge, J. M., Wilson, M. W., Ring, E. J., Gordon, R. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2473070529</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Hepatic Arterial Injuries after Percutaneous Biliary Interventions in the Era of Laparoscopic Surgery and Liver Transplantation: Experience with 930 Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>247</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>886</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>880</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/887?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Recurrent Lower-Limb Varicose Veins: Effect of Direct Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Venographic Findings on Diagnostic Thinking and Therapeutic Decisions]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/887?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To assess the effect of direct three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) venographic findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions in patients with complex recurrent varicose vein anatomy who were being evaluated for surgical treatment.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board; informed consent was obtained from patients. MR venography was performed before surgery in 22 legs of 14 patients (seven women: mean age, 53 years; seven men: mean age, 59 years) thought to have recurrent varicose veins. Two radiologists assessed image quality and evaluated sites and sources of varicose veins on MR venograms. One vascular surgeon completed a questionnaire before and after MR venography and noted diagnosis and therapeutic decisions. Diagnoses at MR venography were compared with surgical results in 19 legs that underwent surgery. Differences between diagnosed and treated varicose veins per leg before and after MR venography were analyzed with logistic regression for survey data.  Values were calculated to illustrate interobserver agreement for grading image quality of venous segments and for diagnosing recurrent varicose veins.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Mean graded image quality of the deep venous system and the recurrent varicose veins was good or excellent in 89% of segments. There was good agreement between readers regarding grading of image quality of venous segments ( = 0.80). After MR venography, diagnosis of the sites and sources of recurrent varicose veins changed in 17 of 22 legs of nine of 14 patients. In one of 14 patients, the preoperative diagnosis of recurrent varicose veins was withdrawn. A change in treatment plan occurred in 17 of 22 legs after MR venography. The number of diagnosed and treated sources of reflux increased significantly after MR venography. MR venographic diagnoses were confirmed at surgery in all 19 legs.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> MR venographic results have a substantial effect on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions when recurrent lower-limb varicose veins are suspected.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muller, M. A., Mayer, D., Seifert, B., Marincek, B., Willmann, J. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2473070987</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Recurrent Lower-Limb Varicose Veins: Effect of Direct Contrast-enhanced Three-dimensional MR Venographic Findings on Diagnostic Thinking and Therapeutic Decisions]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>247</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>895</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>887</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/896?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Imaging Findings after Liver Resection by Using Radiofrequency Parenchymal Coagulation Devices: Initial Experiences]]></title>
<link>http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/short/247/3/896?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<P><B>Purpose:</B> To retrospectively evaluate the imaging features and potential pitfalls in interpreting the findings at the site of surgery in patients undergoing hepatic resection by using the InLine and TissueLink radiofrequency devices for parenchymal coagulation prior to transection.</P>
<P><B>Materials and Methods:</B> This HIPAA&ndash;compliant study was approved by the Institutional Review Board with waiver of informed consent. Twenty-six patients (14 men, 12 women; mean age, 56 years), in whom intraoperative Inline and TissueLink devices were used for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic liver disease or other liver tumors, were identified. Information such as tumor characteristics, diagnostic studies, surgical therapy, and surveillance methods were reviewed. All computed tomographic (CT) and positron emission tomographic (PET) scans and the single magnetic resonance and ultrasonographic images of the abdomen were retrospectively reviewed by a radiologist and compared with the initial interpreting physician's report.</P>
<P><B>Results:</B> Of 35 CT scans, 33 revealed a hypodense line of demarcation (mean thickness, 13.2 mm) between the surgical resection clips and the normal liver parenchyma. This demarcation was interpreted as "could not exclude site recurrence" in three cases and "recurrence or probable recurrence" in five cases. In two CT scans, the hypodense demarcation was not present. In all seven PET scans, the uniform hypermetabolic activity associated with the demarcation was labeled as a recurrence. At follow-up CT (median, 12.5 months), marginal recurrence was not detected in 25 patients, though in one case there was a recurrence in close proximity to the surgical site.</P>
<P><B>Conclusion:</B> The use of InLine and TissueLink devices during hepatectomy is associated with a linear hypodense demarcation at the surgical margin that also demonstrates a symmetrical rimlike hypermetabolic activity seen on PET scans.</P>
<P>&copy; RSNA, 2008</P>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McGahan, J. P., Khatri, V. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-05-16</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1148/radiol.2473070949</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Vascular and Interventional Radiology] Imaging Findings after Liver Resection by Using Radiofrequency Parenchymal Coagulation Devices: Initial Experiences]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>Radiological Society of North America</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>247</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>902</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>896</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Vascular and Interventional Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>